Skip to content

VISERA TRACHEAL INTUBATION VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LF TYPE V (REF N1058730)Recalls & reported problems

Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2

All models of VISERA TRACHEAL INTUBATION VIDEOSCOPE (2)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04953170156250), received between Dec 12, 2019 and Dec 12, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 27, 2023Class IIOpen, Classified

    Complaint of endoscope model becoming lodged in the endotracheal tube connector due to diameter being too large.

    Z-2501-2023 · Root cause: Labeling Change Control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Peeled/Delaminated1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2019Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT, LIMA (LEFT INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY), RIMA (RIGHT INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY), RADIAL, A SMALL PIECE OF RUBBER FROM THE DISTAL END OF THE SCOPE FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S LUNG. THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST WAS CHECKING THE PLACEMENT OF THE TUBE WHEN THE REPORTED EVENT OCCURRED. THE DEVICE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED USING THE SUCTION OF A DIFFERENT SCOPE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. ADDITIONALLY, THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO USE WITH NO OBSERVED ABNORMALITIES.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9458963 ↗

Other BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID) devices

All BRONCHOSCOPE (FLEXIBLE OR RIGID) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page