Skip to content

VISIGLIDE2 G-260-3545SRecalls & reported problems

Terumo Corporation · VISIGLIDE2 Single Use Guidewire · Class 2

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170358258), received between Jun 11, 2020 and Jan 21, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Peeled/Delaminated3
  • Material Separation2
  • Break1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 21, 2026Peeled/Delaminated

    TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, STENT PLACEMENT DURING THE PROCEDURE, GUIDEWIRE SHOWED PEELING OFF PHENOMENON. THE PEELED COATING MAY HAVE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT BODY. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS NOT REPORTED. THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 24130435 ↗
  • InjuryNov 20, 2025Break; Break

    TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING REPORTED INFORMATION: VISIGLIDE 2 GUIDEWIRE USED DURING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL TIP CAME OFF THE GUIDEWIRE AND STAYED IN THE AMPULLA. BIOPSY FORCEPS WERE USED TO RETRIEVE THE TIP. THE TIP WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS AND NO HARM REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 23606615 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    TERUMO MEDICAL CORPORATION RECEIVED THE REPORTED INFORMATION. ON TUESDAY, (B)(6) 2025, DURING AN ERCP PROCEDURE, A VISIGLIDE 0.035 STRAIGHT GUIDEWIRE WAS USED. FROM THE BEGINNING, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS UNUSABLE DUE TO DAMAGE TO THE COATING. THE COATING APPEARED TO BE DEFECTIVE, WHICH CAUSED THE WIRE TO BECOME STUCK INSIDE THE EXTRACTION BALLOON. AS A RESULT, THE MEDICAL TEAM WAS FORCED TO USE A SECOND GUIDEWIRE FOR THE SAME PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE OUTCOME WAS NOT REPORTED; HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23414352 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THEY HAD AN OUT OF BOX FAILURE, THE BLACK COATING WAS MISSING FROM A SECTION OF THE VISIGLIDE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19392377 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2022Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT A SMALL SECTION OF THE G-240-3545S GUIDE WIRE INVOLVED WAS STRIPPED. THIS WAS FOUND WHILE LOADING IT IN THE TOME AND BEFORE USE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14187369 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE SINGLE USE GUIDEWIRE WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. DURING PROCEDURE OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIO PANCREATOGRAPHY PROCEDURE, INTRODUCTION OF THE GUIDE WIRE IN A DUODENOSCOPE, FROM THE FIRST MOBILIZATION OF THE WIRE, IT PEELED OFF IN THE PATIENT. THIS INCIDENT HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. THE PEELED OF PIECES OF THE WIRE REMAINED IN THE SMALL INTESTINE AND WILL BE EVACUATED BY NATURAL WAYS. CHANGE OF GUIDEWIRE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12915394 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 11, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE INVOLVED SINGLE USE GUIDEWIRE WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS AN ERCP. AFTER USE, HYDROPHILIC COATING OF SUBJECT DEVICE WAS FOUND BROKEN OFF OUTSIDE THE PATIENT BODY. THE PHYSICIAN CHANGED TO ANOTHER DEVICE AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. THE PROCESS WAS NOT DELAYED MORE THAN 15 MINUTES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10142144 ↗

Other Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology devices

All Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.