Skip to content

GLIDEWIRE UWS1038Recalls & reported problems

Terumo Corporation · RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE · Class 2

All models of GLIDEWIRE (30)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04987350755650), received between Apr 18, 2019 and Apr 18, 2019 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2

Patient problems

  • No Code Available2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 18, 2019Break; Break

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR WAS USING TWO RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE UROLOGIC WIRES, AND THEY BROKE IN THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN PART WAS RECOVERED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR FATALITY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8527375 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2019Break; Break

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR WAS USING TWO RADIFOCUS GLIDEWIRE UROLOGIC WIRES, AND THEY BROKE IN THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN PART WAS RECOVERED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY OR FATALITY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8527372 ↗

Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices

All Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page