LAMINAR OPOCR3021RRecalls & reported problems
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · LMNR FLOW PHACO CVD TIP 30D 21G SL REUSE · Class 2
All models of LAMINAR (13)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05050474573321), received between Jul 17, 2020 and Nov 4, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Obstruction of Flow” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Obstruction of Flow2
- Complete Blockage1
Patient problems
- Eye Burn3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 4, 2022Complete Blockage; Complete Blockage
PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING CATARACT PROCEDURE AND A CORNEAL BURN OCCURRED IN THE PATIENT'S LEFT EYE. A SUTURE WAS REQUIRED. IT WAS REPORTED THE PHACO NEEDLE MAY HAVE BEEN CLOGGED.
Patient problems: Eye Burn
MAUDE report 15731016 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2020Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow
DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION PROCEDURE, A CORNEAL BURN OCCURRED IN THE PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE. A DESCRIPTION FROM THE SURGERY CENTER INDICATED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON PUT THE PHACO TIP IN THE EYE. AFTER HE PUSHED THE FOOT PEDAL, HE NOTICED PARTICLES COMING OUT OF THE TIP AND THERE WAS LOSS OF VACUUM. A BURN WAS NOTICED, AND A SUTURE WAS USED TO CLOSE THE WOUND. THE SURGEON SWITCHED TO A NEW PHACO TIP AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. A JOHNSON & JOHNSON ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE SPOKE TO THE SURGERY CENTER AND AFTER A CONVERSATION WITH THE ACCOUNT, IT WAS REPORTED THE CUSTOMER RECENTLY SWITCHED TO HEALON ENDOCOAT AND THE REPRESENTATIVE BELIEVES THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SOME VISCOELASTIC STILL STUCK IN THE TIP FROM A PRIOR PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Eye Burn
MAUDE report 10290177 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2020Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow
DURING A CATARACT EXTRACTION PROCEDURE, A CORNEAL BURN OCCURRED IN THE PATIENT¿S OPERATIVE EYE. A DESCRIPTION FROM THE SURGERY CENTER INDICATED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON PUT THE PHACO TIP IN THE EYE. AFTER HE PUSHED THE FOOT PEDAL, HE NOTICED PARTICLES COMING OUT OF THE TIP AND THERE WAS LOSS OF VACUUM. A BURN WAS NOTICED, AND A SUTURE WAS USED TO CLOSE THE WOUND. THE SURGEON SWITCHED TO A NEW PHACO TIP AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. A JOHNSON & JOHNSON ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE SPOKE TO THE SURGERY CENTER AND AFTER A CONVERSATION WITH THE ACCOUNT, IT WAS REPORTED THE CUSTOMER RECENTLY SWITCHED TO HEALON ENDOCOAT AND THE REPRESENTATIVE BELIEVES THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SOME VISCOELASTIC STILL STUCK IN THE TIP FROM A PRIOR PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Eye Burn
MAUDE report 10290154 ↗
Other Unit, phacofragmentation devices
- Centurion 8065751763Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation728 reports
- Centurion 8065753057Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation639 reports
- CENTURION® 8065752914Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation571 reports
- Constellation, Ultravit, 25+, TotalPlus, EdgePlus 8065751617Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation2 recalls398 reports
- Alcon 8065752201Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation1 recall386 reports
- Alcon 8065752200Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation1 recall366 reports
- Constellation, Ultravit, 25+, TotalPlus, EdgePlus 8065751767Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation2 recalls302 reports
- Constellation, ULTRAVIT, Engauge, 25+ 8065752415Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation369 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page