Skip to content

Trinity Biotech 800-970Recalls & reported problems

Clark Laboratories, Inc. · CAPTIA™Syphilis (T. Pallidum)-G · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 05391516744829), received between Jun 21, 2018 and Jun 21, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Off-Label Use” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 21, 2018Off-Label Use

    BIO-RAD TECHNICAL SUPPORT WAS CONTACTED ON (B)(6) 2018 BY A BIO-RAD ACCOUNT MANAGER ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER AT CERRITOS REFERENCE LAB. THE CUSTOMER HAD A QUESTION AS TO HOW THEY SHOULD BE REPORTING RESULTS FOR CAPTIA¿ (B)(6). THE CUSTOMER HAD SWITCHED FROM RPR TESTING TO CAPTIA¿ (B)(6) IGG TESTING DURING THE THIRD WEEK OF (B)(6) 2018, AND THE CUSTOMER WAS REPORTING THE CAPTIA¿ SYPHILIS (T. PALLIDUM) IGG RESULTS OUT AS RPR RESULTS. BIO-RAD TECHNICAL SUPPORT INFORMED THE CUSTOMER THAT THEY HAVE BEEN REPORTING OUT THE RESULTS INCORRECTLY, AND PROVIDED THE INFORMATION AS TO HOW THE RESULTS SHOULD BE REPORTED. AS PART OF THE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION BIO-RAD TECHNICAL SUPPORT DISCOVERED THAT THE CUSTOMER WAS RUNNING CAPTIA¿ (B)(6) IGG FOR TESTS THAT WERE ORDERED AS RPR, AND THAT THE TESTS WERE REPORTED AS RPR. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE SENT A LETTER OUT INFORMING ALL OF THEIR CLINICS OF THE SITUATION, AND THAT THE CUSTOMER WILL TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION TO RESOLVE THE INCIDENT. THIS INCIDENT IS USER ERROR AS THE CUSTOMER DID NOT PERFORM THE TEST THAT WAS ORDERED BY THE PHYSICIAN, AND THE CUSTOMER REPORTED OUT RESULTS INCORRECTLY. BECAUSE RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUT INCORRECTLY THER

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7626067 ↗

Other Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorption Assay, Treponema Pallidum devices

All Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorption Assay, Treponema Pallidum devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.