Skip to content

LifeStream LSMU0800737Recalls & reported problems

Clearstream Technologies Limited · LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent, 7 mm x 37 mm, 80 cm catheter length · Class 3 · Implant

All models of LifeStream (37)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05391522081109), received between Jun 14, 2017 and Dec 13, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Rash1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT GRAFT ALLEGEDLY HAD A HOLE IN IT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY RELINING THE ORIGINAL STENT WITH ANOTHER STENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20923017 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 21, 2023Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY VIA THE LEFT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY APPROACH, THERE WAS TOO MUCH RESISTANCE FELT AND THE STENT GRAFT WAS ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO BE ADVANCED AFTER EXITING THE SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT AFTER REMOVAL OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND THE STENT TOGETHER WITH THE SHEATH, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE STENT GRAFT WAS ALLEGEDLY REMAINED ON THE GUIDEWIRE NOT ON THE BALLOON ITSELF. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17982002 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY DISLODGED FROM THE STENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15181754 ↗
  • InjuryAug 2, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER STENT GRAFT IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY DEVELOPED A RASH ON THE RIGHT LEG WHERE THE DEVICE WAS PLACED.

    Patient problems: Rash

    MAUDE report 8855130 ↗
  • InjuryJun 14, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT DISLODGED FROM THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND A SNARE WAS USED TO REPOSITION THE STENT. THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES NOTED DURING THE PREP OF THE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE BOX, TRAY OR STENT COVER AND THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE STENT COVER. THE TARGET LESION AS THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. THE VESSEL AND TRACKING PATH WERE NOT TORTUOUS OR CALCIFIED. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR AN ANEURYSM AT THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. A 0.035, 260CM AMPLATZ GUIDEWIRE AND A 7F, 10CM CORDIS SHEATH WAS USED. A CONTRALATERAL APPROACH WAS MADE. THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED AND NO RESISTANCE WAS FELT DURING DEVICE TRACKING TO THE LESION. THE STENT DISLODGED OUTSIDE OF THE SHEATH WHILE THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER ATTEMPTED TO REPOSITION THE DELIVERY SYSTEM IN AN 8MM VESSEL. A SNARE WAS USED TO REPOSITION THE STENT NEAR THE INTENDED PLACEMENT SITE IN THE ILIAC. THE SNARE CATHETER ENGAGED THE INNER PORTION OF THE STENT AND THIS ALLOWED A 0.018 GUIDEWIRE TO BE FED THROUGH THE STENT AND AN ULTRAVERSE DEVICE PASSED THROUGH. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED SLIGHTLY AND THE STENT WAS CAPTURED. THE STENT WAS THEN IMPLANTED AT THE TARGET LESION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ISSUES I

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6639954 ↗

Other Iliac covered stent, arterial devices

All Iliac covered stent, arterial devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page