LifeStream LSMU0800958Recalls & reported problems
Clearstream Technologies Limited · LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent, 9 mm x 58 mm, 80 cm catheter length · Class 3 · Implant
All models of LifeStream (37)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 14
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05391522081253), received between Feb 16, 2022 and Sep 2, 2025 — classified as 14 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated7
- Device-Device Incompatibility5
- Retraction Problem3
- Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material2
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions14
Recent adverse event reports
The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 2, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON (B)(6) 2025 A PATIENT UNDERWENT A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE. PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN OPENING THE PACKAGE AND REMOVING THE BALLOON PROTECTOR, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE STENT MOUNTED ON THE BALLOON HAD ALLEGEDLY FALLEN OFF. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22929941 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO ADVANCE THROUGH THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21705176 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Retraction Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material; Retraction Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, THE DELIVERY SYSTEM ALLEGEDLY HAD STRONG RESISTANCE TO REMOVE THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THERE WAS STRONG RESISTANCE IN ADVANCING THE DELIVERY SYSTEM THROUGH THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21705094 ↗MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY VIA FEMORAL ACCESS, THE STENT GRAFT ALLEGEDLY DID NOT GO IN THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE AFTER REPLACING THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20397183 ↗MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Retraction Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility; Retraction Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY DID NOT GO IN THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THERE WAS ALLEGEDLY A RESISTANCE WHILE REMOVING THE STENT FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE AFTER REPLACING THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20396822 ↗MalfunctionJul 17, 2024Break; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Break; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY UNABLE TO BE INSERTED INTO THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19767974 ↗MalfunctionJun 21, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY DROPPED OUT WHEN THE PROTECTOR COVER WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19580562 ↗MalfunctionJun 10, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE VIA GROIN ACCESS, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY CAME OFF OF THE BALLOON WHILE ADVANCING IT THROUGH THE COMMON ILIAC. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED, THE STENT REMAINED IN PLACE AND A SMALLER BALLOON WAS USED TO INFLATE THE STENT. THE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19495988 ↗MalfunctionMay 28, 2024Retraction Problem; Separation Failure; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material; Retraction Problem; Separation Failure; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, DURING PREPARATION OF THE DEVICE, THE STENT SLEEVE ALLEGEDLY COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19402932 ↗MalfunctionNov 14, 2023Difficult to Insert; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Difficult to Insert; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE OF A HIGHLY CALCIFIED TARGET LESION, THERE WAS A RESISTANCE FELT UPON THE DEVICE WAS INSERTING INTO THE SHEATH AND THE EDGE OF THE STENT WAS ALLEGEDLY PEELED OFF. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN REPAIRED THE DEVICE AND ATTEMPTED TO RE-INSERT, BUT THE STENT WAS ALLEGEDLY DISLODGED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18129167 ↗MalfunctionAug 2, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY VIA AN IPSILATERAL RETROGRADE APPROACH, THERE WAS STRONG RESISTANCE FELT UPON ADVANCING IN THE SHEATH AND THE STENT WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND MISALIGNED. THE SYSTEM AND THE SHEATH WERE REMOVED TOGETHER AS ONE UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17442006 ↗MalfunctionApr 20, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE OF A HIGHLY CALCIFIED TARGET LESION, THE STENT ALMOST DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY WITHOUT DISLODGEMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16774730 ↗MalfunctionMar 4, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE VIA A RETROGRADE APPROACH IN THE COMMON ILIAC ARTERY, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY CAME OFF FROM THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13665386 ↗MalfunctionFeb 16, 2022Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON ALLEGEDLY RUPTURED AND DETACHED UPON DEPLOYMENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DETACHED BALLOON WAS RETRIEVED USING SNARE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13540849 ↗
Other Iliac covered stent, arterial devices
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB073902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall2 deaths19 reports
- iCast Covered Stent System, 6mmX16mmX120cm 42616Atrium Medical Corporation · Iliac Covered Stent, Arterial1 recall15 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB057902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall2 deaths14 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB067902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall14 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB075902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall11 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB095902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall8 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB077902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall8 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB085902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall2 deaths8 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page