LifeStream LSMU1350938Recalls & reported problems
Clearstream Technologies Limited · LifeStream™ Balloon Expandable Vascular Covered Stent, 9 mm x 38 mm, 135 cm catheter length · Class 3 · Implant
All models of LifeStream (37)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05391522081260), received between Dec 6, 2017 and Dec 12, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated4
- Migration or Expulsion of Device2
- Bent1
- Failure to Advance1
- Packaging Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- Calcium Deposits/Calcification1
- Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 12, 2023Migration or Expulsion of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY VIA BRACHIAL ACCESS, THE STENT GRAFT ALLEGEDLY DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE STENT GRAFT ALLEGEDLY FLOATED INTO THE CAROTID ARTERY. REPORTEDLY, THE STENT WAS UNABLE TO BE RETRIEVED THUS DEPLOYED IN THE CAROTID ARTERY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18308458 ↗MalfunctionAug 1, 2022Packaging Problem; Packaging Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A STENT GRAFT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PRODUCT BOX WAS ALLEGEDLY DAMAGED AND FOUND WET UPON OPENING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15137431 ↗MalfunctionSep 25, 2020Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT IN THE ILIAC LESION, THE STENT ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO DEPLOY FROM THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE STENT ALLEGEDLY CAME OFF WHEN THE DEVICE WAS PULLED OUT OF THE SHEATH. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10585366 ↗MalfunctionFeb 19, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON EXPANDABLE VASCULAR COVERED STENT ALLEGEDLY DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON AS IT WAS PASSED OVER THE GUIDEWIRE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE COVERED STENT WAS RECANNULATED IN ANOTHER AREA OF THE VESSEL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8352287 ↗InjuryDec 6, 2017Bent; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT DISLODGED AND MIGRATED REQUIRING A SURGICAL CUT DOWN TO REMOVE IT. THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES NOTED DURING THE PREP OF THE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE BOX, TRAY OR STENT COVER AND THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE STENT COVER. THE PATIENT WAS TO BE TREATED FOR SUBCLAVIAN STENOSIS. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS TO BE USED IN THE LEFT OSTIAL SUBCLAVIAN LESION. THE LESION WAS 40% CALCIFIED AND THERE WAS STENOSIS. THE LESION WAS TORTUOUS. FEMORAL ACCESS WAS MADE. A 7FR SHUTTLE, 90CM INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS USED. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS PREPPED CORRECTLY AND DELIVERED OVER A 035 GUIDEWIRE THROUGH THE SHEATH TO THE TARGET LESION. THE TRACKING PATH WAS 40% CALCIFIED. THE STENT GRAFT WAS PROTECTED BY THE SHEATH DURING ALL STEPS OF TRACKING TO THE TARGET LESION. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE FELT WHEN TRACKING THE DEVICE. THE 9X38 STENT WAS DECIDED TO BE TOO LONG TO TREAT THE LESION AND IT WAS THEREFORE DECIDED TO BE REMOVED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED OVER THE WIRE BACK THROUGH THE SHEATH. WHEN RETRACTING THE DEVICE THE STENT DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON NEAR THE EDGE OF THE SHEATH. THERE WAS A BEND IN THE WIRE ALSO WHICH WAS THOUGHT MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE DI
Patient problems: Calcium Deposits/Calcification; Injury
MAUDE report 7085972 ↗
Other Iliac covered stent, arterial devices
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB073902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall2 deaths19 reports
- iCast Covered Stent System, 6mmX16mmX120cm 42616Atrium Medical Corporation · Iliac Covered Stent, Arterial1 recall15 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB057902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall2 deaths14 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB067902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall14 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB075902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall11 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB095902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall8 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB077902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall8 reports
- GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endo BXB085902AW. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. · Iliac covered stent, arterial1 recall2 deaths8 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page