Skip to content

Celt ACD Vascular Closure Device 7F KCLT-07Recalls & reported problems

Vasorum Limited · Celt ACD Vascular Closure Device 7F · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05391530280129), received between Sep 5, 2023 and Apr 17, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
  • Pseudoaneurysm1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 17, 2025Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 7F CELT ACD DEVICE WAS DEPLOYED AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. UPON EJECTION THE IMPLANT MIGRATED TO THE POPLITEAL ARTERY. PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE SURGERY AND THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED. PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO HAVE NO COMPLICATIONS AFTER PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 21855062 ↗
  • InjurySep 5, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO DEPLOY THE PROXIMAL WING THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT THE DEVICE FELT AS IF IT PULLED THROUGH THE ARTERIAL WALL. IT APPEARS THAT PHYSICIAN EJECTED THE IMPLANT FROM THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AT THIS POINT AS THE IMPLANT IS REPORTED TO BE IN THE SOFT TISSUE UNDER THE SKIN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND MANUAL PRESSURE HELD FOR 10 MINUTES. 3 DAYS LATER THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK TO THE FACILITY WITH SYMPTOMS OF PSEUDOANEURYSM. THE PHYSICIAN USED A THROMBIN INJECTION TO TREAT THE PSEUDOANEURYSM. THERE WAS NO FURTHER INCIDENT AND TO OUR KNOWLEDGE THE PATIENT IS NOW WELL. ON A FURTHER UPDATE IMPLANT WAS OBSERVED TO BE AWAY FROM THE ARTERIAL WALL IN THE TISSUE TRACT.

    Patient problems: Pseudoaneurysm

    MAUDE report 17681064 ↗

Other Device, Hemostasis, Vascular devices

All Device, Hemostasis, Vascular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page