Swartz™ 407452Recalls & reported problems
St. Jude Medical, Inc. · BRAIDED TRANSSEPTAL GUIDING INTRODUCER · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05414734205764), received between Feb 5, 2019 and Apr 2, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fluid/Blood Leak2
- Material Separation2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Fracture1
- Gas/Air Leak1
- Material Puncture/Hole1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Cardiac Perforation1
- Foreign Body Embolism1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Stroke/CVA1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 2, 2026Fluid/Blood Leak
DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SHEATH LEAKED. THE INTRODUCER WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24764086 ↗MalfunctionMar 2, 2026Fluid/Blood Leak
DURING A PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION PROCEDURE, BLOOD LEAKED FROM THE HEMOSTASIS VALVE. THE SHEATH WAS EXCHANGED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24492321 ↗MalfunctionMar 2, 2026Gas/Air Leak
DURING AN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PROCEDURE, AFTER PERFORMING TRANSSEPTAL PUNCTURE WHILE FLUSHING, AIR BUBBLES WERE OBSERVED. THE SHEATH WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24485007 ↗MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole
DURING THE TRANSSEPTAL PUNCTURE, THE DILATOR AND THE SHEATH WERE PUNCTURED SEVERAL TIMES BY THE NEEDLE IN THE AREA OF THE CURVATURE. BOTH THE NEEDLE AND THE SHEATH WERE REPLACED. AN AGILIS SHEATH WAS USED WHICH RESOLVED THE ISSUE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23824632 ↗InjuryJul 25, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation
DURING THE ATRIAL FIBRILLATION PROCEDURE, PART OF THE SHEATH BROKE OFF FROM THE DEVICE REQUIRING SURGICAL INTERVENTION TO RETRIEVE IT. ALL PIECES WERE ACCOUNTED FOR WITH FLUOROSCOPY. THE PHYSICIAN CANCELLED THE PROCEDURE DUE TO THE ISSUE WITH THE SHEATH.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 19825939 ↗InjuryApr 29, 2021Fracture; Difficult to Insert; Material Separation; Fracture; Difficult to Insert; Material Separation
DURING A VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA PROCEDURE, THE GRAY SOFT TIP OF THE SHEATH DETACHED IN PATIENT AND TWO DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED STROKE SYMPTOMS. AN MRI WAS CONDUCTED TO INITIALLY DIAGNOSE THE STROKE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, DIFFICULTY WAS NOTED WHEN INSERTING A NON-ABBOTT 8.5F CATHETER INTO THE INTRODUCER AFTER MAPPING AND ABLATION WAS CONDUCTED. ADDITIONALLY, THE 8.5F NON-ABBOTT CATHETER WAS DIFFICULT TO FULLY INSERT THROUGH THE SHEATH AND MANIPULATING THE CATHETER IN THE PATIENT FELT ABNORMAL. THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE SHEATH AND CATHETER TOGETHER FROM THE PATIENT AND UPON REMOVAL, THE GRAY SOFT TIP OF THE SHEATH WAS NOTED TO HAVE BEEN DETACHED. THE REMAINDER OF THE SHEATH TIP WAS SHEARED AND HANGING AT THE END OF THE SHEATH. NO INTERVENTION WAS ADMINISTERED AS THE GRAY SOFT TIP PIECES HAD APPEARED TO DISINTEGRATE IN THE PATIENT AND ALL PIECES WERE NOT ACCOUNTED FOR SINCE THEY COULD NOT BE VISUALIZED DUE TO BEING OPAQUE. TWO DAYS FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED STOKE SYMPTOMS OF BLURRED VISION OF THE LEFT EYE, HOWEVER NO INTERVENTION WAS NOTED TO HAVE BEEN CONDUCTED. FURTHER INFORMATION REGARDING PRE ANTICOAGULATION AND TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY A
Patient problems: Foreign Body Embolism; Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 11749586 ↗InjuryFeb 5, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
RELATED MANUFACTURING REF: 3008452825-2019-00041, 3008452825-2019-00042, 3008452825-2019-00043, 3008452825-2019-00044, 3005334138-2019-00050, 3005334138-2019-00051, 3008452825-2019-00045. FOLLOWING A PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION PROCEDURE, A PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WAS NOTED VIA ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY. A PERICARDIOCENTESIS WAS PERFORMED TO STABILIZE THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS WERE NOTED THROUGHOUT THE PROCEDURE AND THERE WERE NO PERFORMANCE ISSUES WITH ANY ABBOTT DEVICE.
Patient problems: Cardiac Perforation
MAUDE report 8304822 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page