Beltone 19962900Recalls & reported problems
Gn Hearing A/S · HI,BOP995-DW,BGE · Class 2
All models of Beltone (17)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 05704819291462), received between Aug 27, 2020 and Aug 27, 2020 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Skin Irritation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 27, 2020Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
WE HEREBY FORWARD A MIR REPORT RE. AN INCIDENT IN (B)(6): ALLERGIC REACTION REPORTED BY DISPENSER. PATIENT SYMPTOM: DERMATOLOGIC IRRITATION (HEAD AND NECK) TIME OF USE BEFORE SYMPTOM APPEARED: THE REACTION APPEARED WITHIN THE FIRSTS WEEKS AND LASTED FOR THE TIME THE DEVICES WERE WORN BY THE PATIENT. THE SKIN REACTION HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY DOCTOR (SUMMARY REPORT ATTACHED TO THE CASE). ACCORDING TO THIS REPORT, THE REACTION IS CAUSED BY THE MATERIALS USED TO PRODUCE THE DEVICE AS THE TREATMENT PRESCRIBED (NOT SPECIFIED) DID NOT PRODUCE THE EXPECTED RESULTS WHILE HE PATIENT WORE THE DEVICES, BUT THE PATIENT GOT SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER WHEN SHE STOP WEARING THE INSTRUMENTS. ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT SPECIFIED IN THE REPORT, ACCORDING TO THE CONVERSION WITH THE DISPENSER, THE DOCTOR THINKS THE REACTION WAS CAUSED BY THE NANO COATING TREATMENT (17369900 NANO COATING, ARIDION 120 C1). THE PATIENT DOES NOT HAVE A PREVIOUS HISTORY OF ALLERGIC REACTIONS, ALTHOUGH ACCORDING TO THE CONVERSATION WITH THE DISPENSER, SHE HAS A "VERY SENSITIVE" SKIN. ENVIRONMENT: ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE DISPENSER, THE REACTION DOES NOT SEEM TO BE CAUSED BY WEARING THE DEVICE IN A SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENT (H
Patient problems: Skin Irritation
MAUDE report 10458790 ↗
Other Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology devices
- GN ReSound 20472100Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology55 reports
- GN ReSound 21625000Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology20 reports
- Phonak Brand 050-0889-P5Sonova AG · Hearing Aid, Air Conduction With Wireless Technology8 reports
- GN Hearing 21655200Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology8 reports
- Beltone 20623200Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology7 reports
- Beltone 21625700Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology7 reports
- GN Hearing 20863700Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology5 reports
- Phonak Audéo I90-Sphere (graphite gray)Sonova AG · Hearing Aid, Air-Conduction With Wireless Technology, Prescription5 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page