Skip to content

aScope™ Duodeno 482001000Recalls & reported problems

Ambu A/S · aScope Duodeno · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 05707480145287), received between Nov 4, 2021 and Dec 2, 2021 — classified as 4 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • Abdominal Pain2
  • Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure2
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Perforation2
  • Swelling/ Edema2
  • Ulcer2

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 2, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ERCP WAS PERFORMED ON AN ELDERLY PATIENT WITH AN ACTIVE BLEEDING ULCER AND BILATERAL UNDER EXTREMITY EDEMA AND, WHICH IS A SYMPTOM FOR A WIDE RANGE OF MEDICAL CONDITIONS INCLUDING CHRONIC HEART FAILURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN HAD DIFFICULTY EXITING THE STENT THROUGH THE DISTAL END OF THE WORKING CHANNEL. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED THREE UNSUCCESSFUL CONSECUTIVELY TIMES TO DELIVER THE STENT AND DURING THIS THE WIRE WAS RELEASED FROM THE ELEVATOR WHICH CONTRIBUTED TO A PROLONGED PROCEDURE. DURING THIS PROLONGED PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A CARDIAC FAILURE. THE MALFUNCTIONING SCOPE WAS REMOVED, AND A NEW SCOPE WAS USED TO INSTALL THE STENT AND STABILIZE THE PATIENT. AFTER THE PROCEDURE THE PATIENT WAS REFERRED TO THE ICU.

    Patient problems: Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Swelling/ Edema; Ulcer

    MAUDE report 12918119 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2021Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ERCP WAS PERFORMED ON AN ELDERLY PATIENT WITH AN ACTIVE BLEEDING ULCER AND BILATERAL UNDER EXTREMITY EDEMA AND, WHICH IS A SYMPTOM FOR A WIDE RANGE OF MEDICAL CONDITIONS INCLUDING CHRONIC HEART FAILURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN HAD DIFFICULTY EXITING THE STENT THROUGH THE DISTAL END OF THE WORKING CHANNEL. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED THREE UNSUCCESSFUL CONSECUTIVELY TIMES TO DELIVER THE STENT AND DURING THIS THE WIRE WAS RELEASED FROM THE ELEVATOR WHICH CONTRIBUTED TO A PROLONGED PROCEDURE. DURING THIS PROLONGED PROCEDURE THE PATIENT HAD A CARDIAC FAILURE. THE MALFUNCTIONING SCOPE WAS REMOVED, AND A NEW SCOPE WAS USED TO INSTALL THE STENT AND STABILIZE THE PATIENT. AFTER THE PROCEDURE THE PATIENT WAS REFERRED TO THE ICU.

    Patient problems: Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure; Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Swelling/ Edema; Ulcer

    MAUDE report 12916713 ↗
  • InjuryNov 29, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2021, PHYSICIAN USED ASCOPE DUODENO IN A GI PROCEDURE. NO MEDICAL DEVICE FAILURE WAS NOTED FOR THE DUODENOSCOPE DURING THE PROCEDURE. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT CAME BACK WITH ABDOMINAL PAIN AND DURING FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURE A SMALL PERFORATION WAS FOUND. NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON WHICH BODY STRUCTURE PART THE PERFORATION WAS. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS NOT AFFECTED.

    Patient problems: Abdominal Pain; Perforation

    MAUDE report 12887243 ↗
  • InjuryNov 29, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2021 PHYSICIAN USED SCOPE DUODENO IN A GI PROCEDURE. NO MEDICAL DEVICES FAILURE WAS NOTED FOR THE DUODENOSCOPE DURING THE PROCEDURE. ON (B)(6) 2021 THE PATIENT CAME BACK WITH ABDOMINAL PAIN AND DURING FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURE A SMALL PERFORATION WAS FOUND. NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE ON WHICH BODY STRUCTURE PART THE PERFORATION WAS. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS NOT AFFECTED.

    Patient problems: Abdominal Pain; Perforation

    MAUDE report 12880680 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component

    DURING PROCEDURE WHEN TRYING TO GET THE WIRE THROUGH THE BALLOON CATHETER THE ENDOSCOPIST EXPERIENCED PROBLEMS, A DETACHMENT BETWEEN THE OUTER PART OF HANDLE AND INSERTION TUBE WAS DETECTED. THE MAIN TUBE WAS STILL CONNECTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS IMMEDIATELY DISCONTINUED, AND THE MALFUNCTIONING SCOPE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW SCOPE. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS NOT AFFECTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12752533 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 4, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    DURING PROCEDURE WHEN TRYING TO GET THE WIRE THROUGH THE BALLOON CATHETER THE ENDOSCOPIST EXPERIENCED PROBLEMS, A DETACHMENT BETWEEN THE OUTER PART OF HANDLE AND INSERTION TUBE WAS DETECTED. THE MAIN TUBE WAS STILL CONNECTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS IMMEDIATELY DISCONTINUED, AND THE MALFUNCTIONING SCOPE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW SCOPE. PATIENT OUTCOME WAS NOT AFFECTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12750718 ↗

Other Duodenoscope and accessories, flexible/rigid devices

All Duodenoscope and accessories, flexible/rigid devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page