Signia INSIO 7AX C&GRecalls & reported problems
Ws Audiology Usa, Inc. · Signia INSIO 7AX C&G Hearing Aid · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 05714880148688), received between Mar 12, 2024 and Mar 12, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
Patient problems
- Laceration(s)1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 12, 2024Break; Break
IN THIS EVENT, PATIENT WAS WORKING OUTSIDE ON HIS TRUCK, TURNED AND HEARD A LOUD CRACK AND POP. PATIENT STATES THAT SOMETHING DIDN'T FEEL RIGHT, HE REACHED UP TO TAP THE HEARING AID TO READJUST AND THERE WAS BLOOD POURING ALONG THE SIDE OF HIS FACE. HIS HEARING AID HAD SHATTERED INTO PIECES WHILE STILL CONNECTED TO HIS EAR. THERE WAS MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND INJURY AS STATED IN THE COMPLAINT FILE. PATIENT WENT TO CLINIC WHERE THE HCP OBSERVED 2 LACERATIONS IN THE CONCHA NEAR THE APERTURE OF THE CANAL AND OTOSCOPY REVEALED EVIDENCE OF BLOOD TO THE SECOND BEND. HCP ADVISED PATIENT TO GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM, BUT PATIENT DID NOT. PATIENT INFORMED HCP THE NEXT DAY THAT THERE ARE NO LACERATIONS OR BURNING IN THE EAR CANAL, ALTHOUGH THERE IS DRIED BLOOD IN THE CANAL THAT THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REMOVING AT HOME. INVESTIGATION RESULTS: RESULTS FROM TECHINICAL INVESTIGATION FOUND THE RETURNED DEVICE HAD BEEN MANIPULATED; THERE WAS A VISIBLE MARKING OF PENETRATION WITH SHARP/HARD OBJECT ON THE FACEPLATE AND LACQUERED SHELL HAD BEEN GRINDED DOWN. THIS MANIPULATION MAY HAVE COMPROMISED THE INTEGRITY OF THE SHELL AND LEAD DIRECTLY TO THE DESCRIBED FAILURE (DEVICE BROKE INTO PIECES) WHICH WEAKENE
Patient problems: Laceration(s)
MAUDE report 18888251 ↗
Other Hearing Aid, Air Conduction With Wireless Technology devices
- GN ReSound 20472100Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology55 reports
- GN ReSound 21625000Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology20 reports
- GN Hearing 21655200Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology8 reports
- Phonak Brand 050-0889-P5Sonova AG · Hearing Aid, Air Conduction With Wireless Technology8 reports
- Beltone 20623200Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology7 reports
- Beltone 21625700Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology7 reports
- Phonak Audéo I90-Sphere (graphite gray)Sonova AG · Hearing Aid, Air-Conduction With Wireless Technology, Prescription5 reports
- GN Hearing 20863700Gn Hearing A/S · Hearing aid, air conduction with wireless technology5 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page