Skip to content

Polyaxial Pedicle Screw 86138Recalls & reported problems

Premia Spine Ltd · Polyaxial Pedicle Screw Cannulated, Torx Setscrew, Grooved 7.5x45 mm · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290014064928), received between Apr 24, 2023 and Nov 22, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 22, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    PATIENT IMPLANTED WITH THE PROMIS FIXATION SYSTEM IN GERMANY, UNDERWENT A SECOND REVISION SURGERY TWO MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST REVISION DUE TO ANOTHER SCREW LOOSENING. THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO STENOSIS AND SPONDYLODISCITIS AND INCLUDED FUSION AT L5-S1. IN THE FIRST REVISION SURGERY, TWO PEDICLE SCREWS IN S1 VERTEBRA WERE REPLACED BY TWO NEW LARGER DIAMETER PEDICLE SCREWS. L5 SCREWS REMAINED IN-SITU AND RODS WERE RE-USED. IN THE SECOND REVISION SURGERY, TWO PEDICLE SCREWS IN S1 VERTEBRA WERE REPLACED BY TWO NEW LONGER PEDICLE SCREWS. L5 SCREWS REMAINED IN-SITU AND RODS WERE REPLACED WITH NEW IDENTICAL RODS. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON WHO PERFORMED BOTH REVISION PROCEDURES, THE REASON FOR SCREW LOOSENING WAS BONE DISEASE (SPONDYLODISCITIS).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18190215 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    THE COMPANY RECEIVED TWO BROKEN PEDICLE SCREWS THAT WERE EXPLANTED IN A REVISION SURGERY OF THE PROMIS SYSTEM IN THE US. THE EXPLANTS ARRIVED IN A PLASTIC CONTAINER, LABELED WITH THE PATIENT INITIALS AND DATE OF BIRTH WHICH ALLOWED TRACEABILITY TO THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE. THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON 02.05.2016 AND WAS A 5-LEVEL FUSION FROM L2 TO S1. THE INVOLVED SCREWS (7.5X45MM) WERE IMPLANTED IN THE S1 LEVEL. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE REGARDING THE ORIGINAL OR REVISION SURGERIES, PATIENT'S CLINICAL BACKGROUND AND OTHER RELEVANT CLINICAL INFORMATION DESPITE MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO RECEIVE INFORMATION FROM THE SURGEON WHO PERFORMED THE INDEX AND REVISION SURGERIES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16795535 ↗

Other Orthosis, Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation devices

All Orthosis, Spondylolisthesis Spinal Fixation devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page