Skip to content

IceSphere® 1.5 Cryoablation Needle FPRPR3258Recalls & reported problems

Galil Medical Ltd · 1.5mm Cryoablation Needle · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07290104830211), received between Nov 7, 2017 and Nov 7, 2017 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Operates Differently Than Expected” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Nov 18, 2020Class IICompleted

    Complaint trend regarding needle shaft gas leaks.

    Z-0674-2021 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected2

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 7, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE FIRST CYCLE WAS COMPLETED, THE PHYSICIAN STARTED TO DO FREEZING FOR THE SECOND CYCLE. THEY USED TWO ICESPHERE NEEDLES AND ONE OF THEM STARTED TO BE THAWING EVEN THOUGH THE SYSTEM WAS IN FREEZE MODE. ALTHOUGH THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, THE TUMOR ABLATION WAS REPORTEDLY NOT SUCCESSFUL. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7008018 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 7, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE FIRST CYCLE WAS COMPLETED, THE PHYSICIAN STARTED TO DO FREEZING FOR THE SECOND CYCLE. THEY USED TWO ICESPHERE NEEDLES AND ONE OF THEM STARTED TO BE THAWING EVEN THOUGH THE SYSTEM WAS IN FREEZE MODE. ALTHOUGH THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, THE TUMOR ABLATION WAS REPORTEDLY NOT SUCCESSFUL. THERE WERE NO KNOWN PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7008015 ↗

Other Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories devices

All Unit, Cryosurgical, Accessories devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page