Skip to content

POLARSTEM 75100479Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · POLARSTEM LATERAL NON-CEMENTED WITH Ti/HA 6 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of POLARSTEM (63)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07611996118704), received between Oct 9, 2018 and May 3, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Fracture2
  • Break1
  • Delivered as Unsterile Product1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Hip Fracture1
  • Injury1
  • Medical device site infection1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 3, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A THR HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, ONE (1) POLARSTEM STEM LAT.TI/HA 6 NON-CEM BROKE ON THE NECK. THIS ADVERSE EVENT WAS SOLVED BY A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2026. CURRENT HEALTH STATUS OF PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 25062854 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A THR SURGERY HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN INFECTION. THIS ADVERSE EVENT WAS SOLVED BY A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025, IN WHICH ONE (1) POLARSTEM STEM LAT.TI/HA 6 NON-CEM, ONE (1) OXINIUM FEM HD 12/14 36 MM M/+4, ONE (1) R3 3 HOLE HA CTD ACET SHELL 56MM AND ONE (1) R3 0 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 36MM X MM56 WERE EXPLANTED AND A CEMENTED SPACER WAS INSERTED TO TREAT THE INFECTION. CURRENT HEALTH STATUS OF PATIENT REMAINS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 22873149 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A THR SURGERY HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022, THE POLARSTEM STEM LAT.TI/HA 6 NON-CEM BROKE WITHOUT TOO MUCH STRESS. THIS ADVERSE EVENT WAS SOLVED BY A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024, IN WHICH THE STEM WAS REPLACED WITH A REDAPT REVISION STEM. PATIENT´S CURRENT HEALTH STATUS IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 21393217 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2024Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A THR SURGERY, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE POLARSTEM STEM LAT.TI/HA 6 NON-CEM CAME WITH THE PACKAGING OPEN. IN ORDER TO USE IT, IT HAD TO BE STERILIZED AGAIN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED, AFTER A DELAY GREATER THAN 30 MIN, WITH THE SAME REPORTED DEVICE. NO INJURIES WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19047302 ↗
  • InjuryJan 19, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A LEFT THR INDEX SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2016 TO ADDRESS OSTEOARTHRITIS SYMPTOMS, THE PATIENT PRESENTED A PERI-PROSTHETIC FRACTURE THAT MADE NECESSARY A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2016. DURING THIS PROCEDURE, THE FEMORAL HEAD AND STEM WERE EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH COMPETITOR DEVICES. THIS INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, AS PART OF A RETROSPECTIVE DATA COLLECTION OF PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT A PRIMARY THR SURGERY WITH A HIP PROSTHESIS CONSTRUCT THAT INCLUDED A POLARSTEM STEM WITH AN R3 ACETABULAR CUP AND THAT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO SPECIFIC REASONS. AS SUCH, NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 16205951 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER THR SURGERY HAD BEEN PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2015, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PERI PROSTHETIC FRACTURE, THEREFORE, THE PATIENT NEEDED A REVISION STEM (WHICH WAS A STRYKER STEM) AND A HEAD/ POLY EXCHANGE. THIS ADVERSE EVENT WAS SOLVED BY REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. CURRENT HEALTH STATUS OF PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12701851 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A THR PROCEDURE THE FEMUR WAS MILLED WITH A REAMER 6 AND WHEN THEY TRIED TO PLACE A STEM 6L WAS 1CM OUTSIDE THE FEMUR. THEN, SURGEON MILLED WITH A REAMER 7, BUT NOT COMPLETELY, AND TRIED TO PUT THE STEM 6 BACK BUT IT WAS STILL 5MM OUTSIDE. DR. OPENED A NEW 6L STEM AND IT WAS A PERFECT FIT. IN THIS PROCESS, A PERI-PROSTHETIC FRACTURE OCCURRED NEAR THE CALCAR FEMORAL AND IT WAS NECESSARY TO PUT A WIRE CERCLAGE. WITH THIS PROCESS THE SURGERY TOOK EXTRA 15 MINUTES, UNTIL THE USE OF THE NEW DEFINITIVE FEMORAL STEM.

    Patient problems: Hip Fracture

    MAUDE report 11009135 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2018Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A FALL POST OP AND NOW PRESENTS WITH PERI PROSTHETIC FRACTURE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury

    MAUDE report 8051509 ↗
  • InjuryOct 9, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO DELAYED HIP PROSTHESIS INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7950203 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal/polymer, cemented or uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal/polymer, cemented or uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page