OMEGA 704004Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · Connecting Bolt · Class 1
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613153054436), received between Aug 20, 2015 and Feb 14, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break4
- Fracture3
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Injury1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 14, 2020Fracture; Fracture
THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT THE SCREW THREAD BROKE OFF FROM THE PRODUCT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9711072 ↗MalfunctionDec 26, 2019Fracture; Fracture
THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT THE SCREW THREAD BROKE OFF FROM THE PRODUCT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9521809 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2019Break; Fracture; Fracture
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT ONE OF THE CONNECTING BOLTS ON THE DHS TRAY 704004, HAS SNAPPED OFF INSIDE A PATIENT DURING A PROCEDURE. THIS COULD NOT BE REMOVED AND HAS BEEN LEFT IN THE PATIENT. **UPDATE** THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH EXTENDED INCISION. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF 15 MINUTES. THE EVENT HAPPENED WHILST THE LAG SCREW WAS BEING INSERTED INTO THE BONE, THE METAL OF THE CONNECTING BOLT SHEARED OFF IN THE LAG SCREW AT POINT OF CONTACT WITH INSERTION HANDLE. THE PATIENT WAS AN ELDERLY GENTLEMAN AND THE BONE WAS NOT PARTICULARLY HARD, THE SURGEON WAS NOT INSERTING THE LAG SCREW AT AN EXTREME ANGLE. SURGEON DID NOT ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE BOLT. **UPDATE** THE SURGEON FURTHER REPORTED: ~15 CM WAS USED. I EXTENDED PROXIMALLY BY ~5CM TO GAIN A BETTER VIEW OF THE SCREW END AND ALLOW ME TO USE THE PLATE TO TURN THE SCREW. 4-6CM INCISION FOR A DHS WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR A 2 HOLE PLATE. NORMAL INCISION FOR A 4 HOLE PLATE IS IN THE REGION OF ~10 CM. ALTHOUGH IT CAN BE DONE VIA A MINIMALLY INVASIVE THIS IS NOT STANDARD PRACTICE IN (B)(6). EVENT OCCURRED DURING INSERTION OF THE SCREW AND WITH A NORMAL DEGREE OF TURNING ON THE SCREW.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Injury
MAUDE report 9258105 ↗MalfunctionOct 1, 2018Break
PICKED INSTRUMENTS UP FROM HOSPITAL. THEY WERE USED IN A CASE WHERE STRYKER OMEGA IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED. REPLACEMENT IMPLANTS WERE USED, BUT FROM ANOTHER COMPANY. NO REP WAS PRESENT, BUT ALL IMPLANTS REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY. T HANDLE AND LAG SCREW INSERTER STUCK TOGETHER. CONNECTING BOLT THREADS BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7924067 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2018Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INSERTION OF THE LAG-SCREW USING THE ONE-STEP TECHNIQUE, AND PRIOR TO FULLY SEATING THE LAG SCREW, THE CONNECTING BOLT SHEARED OFF. DURING CONTINUED ATTEMPTS TO FULLY SEAT THE SCREW, THE LAG SCREW INTERLOCKING TABS SHEARED OFF. SUBSEQUENT ATTEMPTS TO FULLY SEAT OR REMOVE THE LAG SCREW WERE DIFFICULT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT ADDITIONAL OPERATIVE TIME WAS 30 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7712311 ↗MalfunctionAug 20, 2015Break
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHEN THE LAG SCREW WAS BEING INSERTED THE LAG SCREW SNAPPED OFF THE INSERTER. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THEY WERE USING THE ONE STEP INSERTION APPROACH AND THAT THE BONE WAS VERY HARD. THE CONSULTANT THOUGHT WITH HINDSIGHT THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE TAPPED BECAUSE OF THE HARDNESS OF THE BONE. AFTER THE SCREW SNAPPED A PIECE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT AND THIS WAS REMOVED USING A REDUCTION INSTRUMENT. ANOTHER SCREW WAS AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5019187 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page