AXSOS 371526Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · Locking Screw · Class 2 · Implant
All models of AXSOS (184)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613154864157), received between Nov 21, 2022 and Nov 21, 2022 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
- Inaccurate Information1
Patient problems
- Implant Pain1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 21, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Inaccurate Information; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Inaccurate Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT BROKE HER LEFT SHOULDER AND HAD PLATE PUT IN HER ARM. SHE HAD A REACTION TO THE PLATE AND THE PLATE WAS REMOVED. PAPER IN BOX WITH PLATING SYSTEM HAD DIFFERENT INFORMATION THAN WHAT WAS DOCUMENTED ONLINE. THE PATIENT WANTS MORE INFORMATION ON THE BLOOD TEST THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE CONDUCTED BEFORE THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH THE STRYKER PLATE. THE PATIENT ALLEGES THAT THE SURGEON NEVER DID THE BLOOD TEST. 3 MONTHS AFTER THE PLATE WAS IMPLANTED THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE A SEVERE REACTION WITH IMMENSE SWELLING AND PAIN. PATIENT SAID THE SURGEON TOLD HER THAT THE REACTION WAS IN HER HEAD. PATIENT STATES THAT SHE WAS "TOXIC" DUE TO THE NICKLE THAT WAS BEING EMITTED FROM THE STAINLESS STEEL MATERIAL THE PLATE WAS MADE OF. PATIENT ALLEGES THAT IF THE SURGEON HAD CONDUCTED THE REQUIRED BLOOD WORK PRIOR TO THE SURGERY, THIS ISSUE COULD HAVE BEEN MITIGATED BY THE USE OF A TITANIUM PLATE INSTEAD. THE PATIENT MENTIONED SHE IS WORKING WITH HER ATTORNEY ON A CASE AGAINST THE SURGEON AND THE HOSPITAL AND MENTIONED THAT SHE ALSO FELT STRYKER HAD SOME LIABILITY IN THIS AS WELL.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 15833973 ↗
Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices
- Lapiplasty System 2 SK14Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone260 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls6 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MLT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls5 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PLF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MRT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-DRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PLF40Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PRT42Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page