Skip to content

ANCHORAGE PLP10461Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Plate MTP, left · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ANCHORAGE (52)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252260424), received between Jun 25, 2018 and Feb 24, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Fracture1
  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Pain2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Swelling1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 24, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED RWE REPORT NAMED "SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP IMPLANTS UTILIZING THE PREMIER HEALTHCARE DATABASE" THAT CONTAINS COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 1 JAN 2016 ¿ 30 MAR 2025 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC DEVICE DETAIL, PATIENT INFORMATION, AND CURRENTLY NO ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE; HOWEVER, PATIENT 95 HAD GENERALIZED PAIN

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24428922 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2023Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    AS REPORTED: "FRACTURE OF MTP PLATE FROM ANCHORAGE SYSTEM WHICH RESULTED IN A REVISION SURGERY".

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16467592 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 26, 2019Material Fragmentation

    THE HOSPITAL PHARMACY REPORTED TO THE SALES REP AN EVENT REGARDING AN ARTHRODESIS PLATE REF: (B)(4). IN WHICH THEY INDICATE PRESENCE OF METAL FRAGMENTS OBSERVED AFTER DRILLING AND INSERTING OF THE SCREWS INTO THE PLATE. FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM THE SURGEON ON MARCH 6TH INDICATE THAT HE DOES NOT CONFIRM THE ADVERSE EVENT. HE INDICATED THAT HE GAVE TOO MUCH ANGULATION TO HIS SCREW, WHICH DURING THE SCREWING PROCESS DEPOSITED A TITANIUM THREAD WHICH WAS REMOVED. HE WAS NOT EVEN INFORMED OF THE DECLARATION OF MATERIAL VIGILANCE BY THE PHARMACY. THE SURGEON HAS COMPLETED HIS OPERATION AND IS VERY SATISFIED WITH IT. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES, NO DELAY IN INTERVENTION AND NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8453743 ↗
  • InjuryJun 25, 2018Break

    IT IS ALLEGED BY THE ATTORNEY THROUGH THE FILING OF A LEGAL CLAIM, THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY FOR A LAPIDUS BUNIONECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2017 WHERE SHE WAS IMPLANTED WITH A LEFT STRYKER MTP ANCHORAGE PLATE IN HER RIGHT FOOT. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT ON (B)(6) 2018, WHILE WALKING IN HER CAM BOOT, SHE FELT AND HEARD A CRACK IN HER FOOT AND BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE PAIN AND SWELLING. X-RAYS REVEALED THE PLATE STABILIZING HER FIRST METATARSAL HAD BROKEN, WHICH REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THEY FURTHER ALLEGE THE PLATE WAS BROKEN THROUGH AT THE POINT OF ONE OF THE SCREW HOLES.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Swelling

    MAUDE report 7635367 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page