Skip to content

ANCHORAGE PLP14341Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Plate MTP CP, left · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252260554), received between Jul 18, 2018 and Mar 5, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 4 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Break2
  • Fracture2
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Migration1
  • Pressure Problem1

Patient problems

  • Pain4
  • Failure of Implant2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 5, 2026Migration

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED RWE REPORT NAMED "SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP IMPLANTS UTILIZING THE PREMIER HEALTHCARE DATABASE" THAT CONTAINS COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 1 JAN 2016 ¿ 30 MAR 2025 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC DEVICE DETAIL, PATIENT INFORMATION, AND CURRENTLY NO ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE; HOWEVER, PATIENT 7 HAD DEVICE DISPLACEMENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24517185 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED RWE REPORT NAMED "SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP IMPLANTS UTILIZING THE PREMIER HEALTHCARE DATABASE" THAT CONTAINS COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 1 JAN 2016 ¿ 30 MAR 2025 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC DEVICE DETAIL, PATIENT INFORMATION, AND CURRENTLY NO ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE; HOWEVER, PATIENT 159 HAD GENERALIZED PAIN.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24495956 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED RWE REPORT NAMED "SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP IMPLANTS UTILIZING THE PREMIER HEALTHCARE DATABASE" THAT CONTAINS COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 1 JAN 2016 ¿ 30 MAR 2025 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC DEVICE DETAIL, PATIENT INFORMATION, AND CURRENTLY NO ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE; HOWEVER, PATIENT 141 HAD GENERALIZED PAIN.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24495337 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED RWE REPORT NAMED "SAFETY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP IMPLANTS UTILIZING THE PREMIER HEALTHCARE DATABASE" THAT CONTAINS COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES OF ANCHORAGE AND ANCHORAGE 2 CP. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN 1 JAN 2016 ¿ 30 MAR 2025 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH A SPECIFIC DEVICE DETAIL, PATIENT INFORMATION, AND CURRENTLY NO ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE; HOWEVER, PATIENT 145 HAD GENERALIZED PAIN.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 24495332 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2025Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MTP PLATE WAS BROKEN AFTER IMPLANTATION IN THE PATIENT. THE PRIMARY SURGERY IN QUESTION WAS THE ARTHRODESIS FOR HALLUX VALGUS AND RIGIDUS. THE SURGEON HAS PERFORMED THE REVISION OPERATION ON THE BROKEN PLATE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21806635 ↗
  • InjuryJun 28, 2023Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    AS REPORTED: "ARTHRODESIS 1ST MTP LEFT FOOT IN 04/22 BY PLATE. PSEUDARTHRODESIS WITH BROKEN PLATE. PATIENT REQUIRES REVISION SURGERY."

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17217791 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 16, 2019Material Twisted/Bent; Loose or Intermittent Connection; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE WHEN THE SCREW WAS INSERTED INTO THE LOCKING PLATE, IT STRIPPED THE THREAD OF THE PLATE SO THAT THE PLATE WOULD NO LONGER LOCK. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE CORRECT GUIDE, SCREW AND DRILL BIT WERE USED. THE PLATE WAS DISCARDED AND A NEW ONE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9333093 ↗
  • InjuryJul 18, 2018Pressure Problem

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN IN HER FOOT, WHICH SHE HAD FOR 6 MONTHS FOLLOWING INITIAL IMPLANTATION WITH AN ANCHORAGE PLATE. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED THAT PART OF THE TOE DID NOT FLEX. THE PATIENT HAD 2 OPINIONS POST OPERATIVELY WHEN SHE PRESENTED WITH THE PAIN PLUS X-RAYS AND SCANS WHICH SHOWED NO ISSUE WITH THE PLATE. DURING A 3RD CONSULTATION, A SPECTORAL SCAN SHOWED PRESSURE IN AREAS OVER 4 OF THE 5 SCREWS. THE PLATE WAS REVISED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7700736 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page