Skip to content

VARIAX 628205Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Superior Lateral Plate · Class 2 · Implant

All models of VARIAX (345)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252442288), received between May 2, 2017 and Oct 16, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 16, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE VARIAX CLAVICLE PLATE DID NOT SUCCEED IN FIXING THE FRACTURE. IT LOOKS AS IF THE SCREWS (BONE AND LOCKING SCREWS) DISLOCATED FROM THE PLATE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10688279 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 2, 2017Crack

    IT WAS REPORT BY THE PHARMACIST, THAT WHEN MODELING A VARIAX CLAVICLE PLATE USING THE INSTRUMENTATION FROM THE ANCILLARY, THE SURGEON NOTICED A CRACK IN THE PLATE NEAR THE DRILLING HOLE. HE USED ANOTHER PLATE AND BEND IT WITHOUT ANY ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6539070 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page