Skip to content

TARGET XL M0036122050Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 360 Soft Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TARGET XL (34)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327004618), received between Aug 29, 2017 and Jun 15, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT MAIN COIL FAILED TO DETACH. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT MAIN COIL WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25509190 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Fracture; Premature Separation; Fracture; Premature Separation

    THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED/SEPARATED DURING USE AND COIL DELIVERY WIRE BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23824279 ↗
  • InjuryAug 29, 2017Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING THE EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE INSIDE THE PATIENT, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL WAS STRETCHED IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO SNARE IT AND ENDED UP GETTING IT OUT WITH A RETRIEVER. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6829260 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page