Ideal Eyes, Speed-Lock 0502704030Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Arthroscope, Autoclavable, C-Mount, 30 View Direction · Class 2
All models of Ideal Eyes, Speed-Lock (7)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327062755), received between Sep 16, 2020 and Oct 10, 2022 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Poor Quality Image” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Poor Quality Image8
- Optical Problem5
- Misfocusing1
- Nonstandard Device1
- Optical Obstruction1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Insufficient Information5
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 10, 2022Misfocusing; Poor Quality Image; Misfocusing
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS BLURRY IMAGE DURING PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15570638 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2021Optical Problem; Poor Quality Image; Optical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS BLURRY IMAGE DURING PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12789402 ↗MalfunctionOct 21, 2021Optical Problem; Poor Quality Image; Optical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS BLURRY IMAGE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12677875 ↗MalfunctionJun 29, 2021Optical Problem; Poor Quality Image; Optical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS FOGGY IMAGE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12084478 ↗MalfunctionMay 27, 2021Optical Problem; Poor Quality Image; Optical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS FOGGY IMAGE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11894981 ↗MalfunctionApr 27, 2021Poor Quality Image; Optical Problem; Optical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A BLURRY IMAGE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11732992 ↗MalfunctionOct 13, 2020Optical Obstruction; Poor Quality Image; Optical Obstruction
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A BLURRY IMAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10670528 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2020Poor Quality Image; Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A BLURRY IMAGE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10543795 ↗
Other ARTHROSCOPE devices
- FMS 283512Medos International Sàrl · ARTHROSCOPE1,800 reports
- Arthrex® AR-6480Arthrex, Inc. · ARTHROSCOPE949 reports
- FMS VUE 284002Depuy Mitek, LLC · ARTHROSCOPE829 reports
- MITEK 242018Medos International Sàrl · Arthroscope731 reports
- METRx® System 9560100Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Arthroscope667 reports
- FMS VUE II 284004Medos International Sàrl · Arthroscope562 reports
- VAPR COOLPULSE 228146Depuy Mitek, LLC · ARTHROSCOPE474 reports
- FMS DUO 284580Depuy Mitek, LLC · ARTHROSCOPE458 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page