Aero-LL 48940050Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Fixation Anchor · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327066173), received between Mar 25, 2019 and Mar 25, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- No Apparent Adverse Event1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Code Available1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 25, 2019Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR WAS DAMAGED(BENT UPWARD) WHILE INSERTING AT L3 VERTEBRAE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE ANCHOR AND TRIED USING SECOND ANCHOR WHICH WAS DEFORMED AGAIN. THE SURGEON DECIDED NOT TO PLACE BLADE ON THE SUPERIOR LEVEL. THE SURGEON WAS CONTENT WITH THE AMOUNT OF FIXATION AND COMPLETED SURGERY SUCCESSFULLY (FACET FUSION WITH MICRO DECOMPRESSION ON THE POSTERIOR SIDE) USING ANOTHER ANCHOR. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD CONCRETE BONE QUALITY AND THE SURGEON ATTRIBUTED MUCH OF EVENT TO THE BONE QUALITY OF THE PATIENT. A SURGICAL DELAY OF CLOSE TO AN HOUR WAS REPORTED. NO OTHER ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8447952 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2019Material Deformation; No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANCHOR WAS DAMAGED(BENT UPWARD) WHILE INSERTING AT L3 VERTEBRAE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE ANCHOR AND TRIED USING SECOND ANCHOR WHICH WAS DEFORMED AGAIN. THE SURGEON DECIDED NOT TO PLACE BLADE ON THE SUPERIOR LEVEL. THE SURGEON WAS CONTENT WITH THE AMOUNT OF FIXATION AND COMPLETED SURGERY SUCCESSFULLY (FACET FUSION WITH MICRO DECOMPRESSION ON THE POSTERIOR SIDE) USING ANOTHER ANCHOR. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD CONCRETE BONE QUALITY AND THE SURGEON ATTRIBUTED MUCH OF EVENT TO THE BONE QUALITY OF THE PATIENT. A SURGICAL DELAY OF CLOSE TO AN HOUR WAS REPORTED. NO OTHER ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8447890 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, lumbar devices
- PIVOX™ Oblique Lateral Spinal System 2161001Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, lumbar182 reports
- IdentiTi 232-10-85-300Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, lumbar1 recall8 reports
- IdentiTi 232-10-85-250Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, lumbar1 recall5 reports
- IdentiTi 132-10-85-300Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, lumbar1 recall3 reports
- MectaLIF Anterior 03.30.301Medacta International SA · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar1 recall2 reports
- IdentiTi 232-10-85-350Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, lumbar1 recall2 reports
- IdentiTi 232-11-90-350Alphatec Spine, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, lumbar1 recall1 report
- MectaLIF Anterior 03.30.302Medacta International SA · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Lumbar1 recall1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page