Skip to content

VariAx 656312SRecalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Locking Screw, Fully Threaded,T8 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of VARIAX (345)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327070675), received between Dec 16, 2020 and Nov 17, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Failure” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 2 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Positioning Failure3

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 17, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A LOCKING FAILURE OCCURRED. THE 1ST AND 2ND LOCKING SCREWS WERE USED; HOWEVER, THEY DID NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE. CORTICAL SCREWS WERE USED AT THE HOLES. ALTHOUGH A MALFUNCTION OF THE PLATE LOCKING MECHANISM WAS CONSIDERED, THE PLATE WAS NOT REPLACED BECAUSE THREE SCREWS HAD ALREADY BEEN INSERTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23575609 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 17, 2025Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A LOCKING FAILURE OCCURRED. THE 1ST AND 2ND LOCKING SCREWS WERE USED, HOWEVER THEY DID NOT LOCK INTO THE PLATE. CORTICAL SCREW WERE USED AT THE HOLES. ALTHOUGH A MALFUNCTION OF THE PLATE LOCKING MECHANISM WAS CONSIDERED, THE PLATE WAS NOT REPLACED BECAUSE THREE SCREWS HAD ALREADY BEEN INSERTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23573895 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 16, 2020Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    AS REPORTED: "WHEN SCREWING IN A 2.7 DR SCREW, IT DID NOT BLOCK AND COULD BE TURNED. REPLACEMENT WAS AVAILABLE.". ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: "YES, IT HAS BEEN PRE-DRILLED. THE BONE QUALITY WAS VERY POOR.". SURGICAL DELAY OF 2 MINUTES NOT LONGER. NO OTHER CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11016249 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page