TARGET XL M0036124080Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · 360 SOFT Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
All models of TARGET XL (34)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327128390), received between Sep 13, 2017 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture4
- Premature Separation4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Break1
- Expulsion1
- Material Protrusion/Extrusion1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Headache1
- Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Positioning Failure; Expulsion; Positioning Failure; Expulsion
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS HERNIATED, HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE NOTES AND THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS NEVER DEPLOYED DUE TO DIFFICULTIES IN ACCESSING THE TARGET LOCATION. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. UPDATE: RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON (B)(6) 2026 CONFIRMED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS NEVER DEPLOYED DUE TO DIFFICULTIES IN ACCESSING THE TARGET LOCATION AND IT WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE PATIENT. BASED ON THE INFORMATION, THIS EVENT DOES NOT MEET REPORTING CRITERIA ANYMORE . THE MANUFACTURER HAS REVIEWED ALL INFORMATION AND DETERMINED THIS EVENT NO LONGER MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF THE REPORTABLE EVENT FOR THE DEVICE IN QUESTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23838583 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Fracture; Premature Separation; Fracture; Premature Separation
THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS REPORTED FOR ENCOUNTERING RESISTANCE WHILE ADVANCING FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH INTO THE MICROCATHETER AND THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER. HOWEVER, WHEN THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS KINKED, THE MAIN COIL WAS STRETCHED AND HAD SUTURE DAMAGE. ALSO, THE MAIN COIL WAS FOUND TO BE PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE AND WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23585682 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture
THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE MAIN COIL WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23493371 ↗MalfunctionApr 19, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation
DURING THE COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE FOR TREATING CAROTID-CAVERNOUS FISTULA, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETRIEVED, IT PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER WAS REMOVED OUT OF THE PATIENT¿S BODY AND SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME MICROCATHETER WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16768268 ↗MalfunctionJan 18, 2022Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED DURING A CORONARY EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED IN THE CATHETER. THE COIL WAS RETRIEVED WITH THE CATHETER AND WAS REPLACED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13285837 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2019Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS RESISTANCE WHEN THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS ADVANCED INTO THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE COIL AND IT WAS FOUND BROKEN IN CATHETER. THE COIL WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9507503 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation
DURING THE COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) COULD NOT BE PLACED WELL. SO THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO REMOVE IT, HOWEVER, THE MAIN COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER DURING REMOVAL. THEN THE COIL WAS REMOVED TOGETHER WITH THE MICROCATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AFTER REPLACING THE COIL. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9416143 ↗MalfunctionNov 1, 2019Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DELIVERY WIRE OF THE SUBJECT COIL WAS BROKEN AND REMAINED INSIDE THE DETACHMENT SYSTEM DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL WHICH WAS PLACED IN THE ANEURYSM WAS RETRACTED. ANOTHER COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9269231 ↗MalfunctionNov 14, 2018Material Protrusion/Extrusion; Material Protrusion/Extrusion
DURING THE FOLLOW UP, IMAGING CONFIRMED PART OF THE COIL WAS PROTRUDING OUT OF THE SECOND DIVISION OF THE ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY-A2 SEGMENT. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8070515 ↗InjurySep 15, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SUCCESSFUL STENT-ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE RIGHT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA) BIFURCATION. POST-PROCEDURE THE PATIENT WAS ASSESSED HAVING A MRS OF 0. IT WAS REPORTED THAT 9 MONTHS POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED BILATERAL WEAKNESS. THE BILATERAL WEAKNESS WAS ONGOING AND A MRI PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED SHOWING STABLE FINDINGS CONSISTENT WITH CHRONIC SMALL VESSEL ISCHEMIC WHITE MATTER CHANGE. NO INFARCTION WAS IDENTIFIED. ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE BILATERAL WEAKNESS WAS UNRELATED TO THE PROCEDURE AND STENTS. HOWEVER IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE BILATERAL WEAKNESS WAS RELATED TO THE IMPLANTED COILS (SUBJECT DEVICES). THE PATIENT WAS ASSESSED HAVING A MRS OF 0 AT 2, 6 AND 12 MONTHS AND A NIHHS OF 0 AT 12 MONTHS POST THE INDEX PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction
MAUDE report 6870484 ↗InjurySep 13, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SUCCESSFUL STENT-ASSISTED COIL EMBOLIZATION OF AN UN-RUPTURED ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE RIGHT MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA) BIFURCATION. POST-PROCEDURE THE PATIENT WAS ASSESSED HAVING A MODIFIED RANKING SCALE (MRS) OF 0. AT TWO MONTHS FOLLOW-UP VISIT, THE PATIENT WAS ASSESSED HAVING A MRS OF 0. IT WAS REPORTED THAT 6 MONTHS FOLLOW-UP POST THE INDEX PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED HEADACHE. THE HEADACHE WAS REPORTED AS ONGOING AND MEDICATION (UNKNOWN TYPE AND DOSE) WAS ADMINISTERED. ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE HEADACHE WAS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE PROCEDURE AND TO THE STENT. HOWEVER IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE HEADACHE WAS RELATED TO THE IMPLANTED COILS (SUBJECT DEVICES). AT THE 6 MONTHS FOLLOW-UP THE PATIENT WAS ALSO ASSESSED HAVING A NIHSS AND MRS OF 0. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Headache
MAUDE report 6864045 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page