INSTRUMENT 6496-9-055Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · GMRS TAPER SEPARATOR NUT · Class 1
All models of INSTRUMENT (131)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07613327198515), received between Jan 3, 2019 and Jan 3, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 3, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, FOR A PATIENT WHO WAS OPERATED SEVERAL TIMES BY THE SAME SURGEON, THE LAST SURGERY WAS THE SECOND FAILED ATTEMPT TO EXCHANGE THE GROWING PIECE OF HIS GMRS IMPLANT (HMRS/GMRS SPIGOT SEPARATOR). A LONGER GROWING PIECE IS NEEDED, GROWING PIECE THE PATIENT CURRENTLY HAS FAILED/LOST IT¿S ABILITY TO KEEP IT¿S FULL LENGTH. IT IS SUSPECTED THAT SEPARATION OF THE STEM/GROWING PIECE SPIGOT FAILED BECAUSE OF COLD FUSION. THE PATIENT (B)(6) BOY) HAS 6CM DIFFERENCE IN LEG LENGTH, THE ORIGINAL GROWING COMPONENT IS SET TO IT¿S MAXIMUM LENGTH BUT AS IT¿S COLLAPSED ONCE THE PATIENT¿S PARENTS LOST THEIR TRUST IN THE DEVICE. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY/HOW THE DEVICE LOST IT¿S INTERNAL BLOCKAGE, BUT THE SURGEON FOUND IT COLLAPSED ( IN THE SHORTEST POSITION INSTEAD OF THE LAST SET ELONGATION ) IN THE OPERATION WHEN THEY WANTED TO DO THE LAST ADJUSTMENT ( THE LAST 5MM ) BEFORE CHANGING TO THE LONGER PIECE. AFTER THEY WENT THROUGH THE ELONGATION STEPS AGAIN - 2-3 SMALL SURGERIES - THEY REACHED FULL LENGTH AGAIN, THE DEVICE SHOWED NO SIGNS OF FAILURE/INSTABILITY.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties
MAUDE report 8215314 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page