Skip to content

Trident X3 Insert 723-00-32DRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Trident X3 0 Degree Polyethylene Insert · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident X3 Insert (22)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327342710), received between Apr 13, 2023 and May 21, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 2 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Pain3
  • Discomfort2
  • Muscle/Tendon Damage2
  • Wound Dehiscence2
  • Bursitis1
  • Fatigue1
  • Numbness1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 21, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: IT WAS REPORTED THAT: ASEPTIC LOOSENING, INFECTION OF HIP JOINT POST-OPERATIVELY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 25240256 ↗
  • InjuryDec 16, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THIS PI IS FOR THE I&D PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. LEFT HIP. THIS SUBJECT EXPERIENCED PROLONGED WOUND DEHISCENCE RELATED TO A MEDICATION REGIMEN TO TREAT HER RA. CULTURES WERE INITIALLY NEGATIVE BUT THEN CAME BACK POSITIVE FOR PYODERMA GANGRENOSUM. SHE FIRST PRESENTED INTO CLINIC ON (B)(6) 2023 WITH DELAYED HEALING. AT THE NEXT VISIT (ON (B)(6) 2023) DR. DECIDED TO SCHEDULE THE SUBJECT FOR A POSSIBLE REVISION SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2023 DR. PERFORMED AND I&D AND APPLIED AN INCISIONAL WOUND VAC. SHE CONTINUED TO FOLLOW UP WITH ONGOING COMPLAINTS UNTIL ON (B)(6) 2024. ON THAT DATE, THE SUBJECT COMPLETED A FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE AND INDICATED SHE WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH HER STUDY HIP REPLACEMENT. SHE CITED THE REASONS OF "SORENESS" AND "HEALING IS STILL ONGOING." DR. OPINED THAT THIS WOUND RELATED EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICE NOR PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Pain; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 20937308 ↗
  • InjuryDec 16, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THIS PI IS FOR THE ONGOING ISSUES AFTER I&D. LEFT HIP. THIS SUBJECT EXPERIENCED PROLONGED WOUND DEHISCENCE RELATED TO A MEDICATION REGIMEN TO TREAT HER RA. CULTURES WERE INITIALLY NEGATIVE BUT THEN CAME BACK POSITIVE FOR PYODERMA GANGRENOSUM. SHE FIRST PRESENTED INTO CLINIC ON (B)(6) 2023 WITH DELAYED HEALING. AT THE NEXT VISIT (ON (B)(6) 2023) DR DECIDED TO SCHEDULE THE SUBJECT FOR A POSSIBLE REVISION SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2023 DR. PERFORMED AND I&D AND APPLIED AN INCISIONAL WOUND VAC. SHE CONTINUED TO FOLLOW UP WITH ONGOING COMPLAINTS UNTIL ON (B)(6) 2024. ON THAT DATE, THE SUBJECT COMPLETED A FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE AND INDICATED SHE WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH HER STUDY HIP REPLACEMENT. SHE CITED THE REASONS OF "SORENESS" AND "HEALING IS STILL ONGOING." DR. OPINED THAT THIS WOUND RELATED EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICE NOR PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Fatigue; Pain; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 20937307 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO ILIOPSOAS INJURY (REP CONFIRMED INJURY WAS NOT IMPLANT-RELATED). ILIOPSOAS RELEASE WAS PERFORMED, AND A POLY LINER AND CERAMIC HEAD WERE REVISED TO AN MDM METAL LINER, ADM/MDM POLY INSERT, AND METAL FEMORAL HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Muscle/Tendon Damage

    MAUDE report 19519577 ↗
  • InjuryApr 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP AFTER PATIENT COMPLAINT OF FEMORAL PAIN. SURGEON ORIGINALLY SUSPECTED A LOOSE STEM. HOWEVER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, STEM WAS CONFIRMED AS WELL-FIXED. AN ACCOLADE II STEM, HEAD, AND LINER WERE REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT, NEW HEAD, ADM/MDM POLY INSERT, AND MDM METAL LINER (SURGEON REPORTED HE WANTED A DUAL MOBILITY LINER IN THE PATIENT. THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED LINER OR HEAD). REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19184814 ↗
  • InjuryMar 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT UNDERWENT HEAD AND LINER REPLACEMENT DUE TO THA POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18977135 ↗
  • InjuryApr 13, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION (SURGEON REPORTED THAT AFTER PATIENT FELL, A HEMATOMA DEVELOPED AND BECAME INFECTED). A STAGE 1 REVISION WAS PERFORMED WHERE ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND A SPACER WAS PLACED.

    Patient problems: Bursitis; Muscle/Tendon Damage; Numbness; Skin Discoloration; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16729632 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal/polymer, cemented or uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, hemi-, femoral, metal/polymer, cemented or uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page