Skip to content

T2 ALPHA 2360-5035SRecalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Locking Screw · Class 2 · Implant

All models of T2 ALPHA (123)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327366198), received between Jan 30, 2024 and Jul 9, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Biocompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
  • Biocompatibility1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture2
  • Discomfort1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
  • Limb Fracture1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 9, 2025Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility

    AS REPORTED: "THE DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED HIVES ON (B)(6) 2025 AND THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT HE SUSPECTED A METAL ALLERGY CAUSED BY THE IMPLANT. THE DOCTOR REQUEST US TO PROVIDE THE INGREDIENTS LIST IN THE TITANIUM ALLOY OF THE IMPLANTS."

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 22456886 ↗
  • InjuryMay 9, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED: "SUBJECT: (B)(6). STRYKER PEGASUS STUDY. PAIN: PATIENT HAS SOME SORENESS LATERALLY CONSISTENT WITH IRRITATION FROM THE LAG SCREW AFTER THE FRACTURE HEAD COMPRESSED AND HEALED."

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Pain

    MAUDE report 21993230 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 21, 2024Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    SALES REPORTED THE FOLLOWING:" WE JUST INSERTED AN GAMMA3 LONG NAIL, AND THE 5.0 LOCKING SCREW (2360-5035S) IS COMPLETELY STUCK IN THE DISTAL SECTION. IT WAS SLIGHTLY MISALIGNED, BUT THERE'S NO MOVEMENT POSSIBLE IN THE SCREW, NEITHER FORWARD NOR BACKWARDS, AND WE'VE TRIED ALL AVAILABLE OPTIONS. THE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE TO LEAVE IT IN PLACE."

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20495407 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED: "ORIF WAS PERFORMED FOR FEMORAL CONDYLE FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 2024. HOWEVER, IT WAS FOUND THAT FIXATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED ON (B)(6) 2024. THUS, REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE THE DEVICES WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE DOCTOR TOLD THAT THE ORIGINAL FRACTURE WAS SEVERE, AND ALTHOUGH THE DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED IN HOPES OF REDUCING AND MAINTAINING THE FRACTURE, THE FRACTURE PART REMAINED UNSTABLE AFTER SURGERY."

    Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

    MAUDE report 19027915 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED: "ORIF WAS PERFORMED FOR FEMORAL CONDYLE FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 2024. HOWEVER, IT WAS FOUND THAT FIXATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED ON (B)(6) 2024. THUS, REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE THE DEVICES WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2024. THE DOCTOR TOLD THAT THE ORIGINAL FRACTURE WAS SEVERE, AND ALTHOUGH THE DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED IN HOPES OF REDUCING AND MAINTAINING THE FRACTURE, THE FRACTURE PART REMAINED UNSTABLE AFTER SURGERY."

    Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

    MAUDE report 19027474 ↗
  • InjuryJan 30, 2024Off-Label Use; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Off-Label Use; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    AS REPORTED: "SURGERY FOR FRACTURE OF LEFT FEMORAL CONDYLE. THE HOSPITAL OPERATING ROOM STAFF OPENED THE WRONG NAIL ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT SIDE AND INSERTED IT WITHOUT REALIZING THE MISTAKE. AFTER INSERTION, THE STAFF DID NOT NOTICE THE MISTAKE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE. WHEN THEY ATTEMPTED TO INSERT THE LOCKING SCREW, IT DID NOT GO IN PROPERLY, RESULTING IN A FEMORAL DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURE. SUBSEQUENT CONFIRMATION REVEALED THAT THE WRONG NAIL HAD BEEN INSERTED ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT SIDE."

    Patient problems: Limb Fracture

    MAUDE report 18608392 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page