Skip to content

PANGEA 662238Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Locking Screw · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PANGEA (53)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327413731), received between Dec 15, 2025 and Mar 31, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 31, 2026Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Malposition of Device

    DR. (B)(6) REPORTED THE FEEDBACK ON HIS SECOND CASE, IN WHICH HE IMPLANTED A DISTAL MEDIAL FEMUR STRUT AND A DISTAL LATERAL FEMUR STRUT (DUAL-PLATE CONSTRUCT) IN PRESENCE OF PROSTHESES IN BOTH THE HIP AND THE KNEE JOINTS (MANUFACTURER(S) OF PROSTHESES UNKNOWN) HIS FEEDBACK ON EVALUATED ASPECTS IS ALL POSITIVE AND THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTED FORM: "THE 4.0 LOCKING SCREWS WERE DIFFICULT TO LOCKING INTO THE PLATE AT A VARIABLE ANGLE. THIS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE IN THE PAST WITH THE 4.0 LOCKING SCREWS IN OTHER PANGEA LARGE FRAG PLATES ALSO." [PROVIDED AS AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT ON THE PRODUCT AND PROCEDURE].

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24739672 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2025Migration; Migration

    AS REPORTED: "A LARGE FRAGMENT PANGEA PERIPRO INTERPROSTHETIC PLATE WAS USED TO TREAT A MIDSHAFT PERIPROSTHETIC FEMUR FRACTURE. SHORTLY AFTER INITIAL SURGERY DATE ((B)(6) 2025), THE SURGEON NOTICED THE MOST PROXIMAL T20 4.0 PANGEA LOCKING SCREW WAS BEGINNING TO BACK OUT OF THE PLATE. THE SCREW SEQUENTIALLY BACKED OUT OF THE LOCKING MECHANISM AT EACH POST-OPERATIVE VISIT UNTIL THE SCREW FULLY BACKED OUT AND SLID ALL THE WAY DOWN TO HER DISTAL FEMUR". PATIENT HAD TO BE BROUGHT BACK INTO OPERATING ROOM 16 WEEKS POST OPERATIVELY TO REMOVE BACKED OUT HARDWARE (NOW SITTING ADJACENT TO THE DISTAL FEMUR).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23810453 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page