Skip to content

Quadra P femoral stems 01.12.211Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Quadra-P Cemented STD stem #1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Quadra P femoral stems (27)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040732086), received between Oct 26, 2023 and May 29, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain2
  • Medical device site infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 29, 2026Migration

    THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY SURGERY USING COMPETITOR PRODUCTS. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT`S COMPETITOR STEM WAS REVISED TO A QUADRA-P CEMENTED STD. SIZE5 AND A 32MM BIOLOX DELTA HEAD M. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT CAME IN PRESENTING PAIN DUE TO A SUBSIDED STEM AS THE RESULT OF THE CEMENT NOT ADHERING TO THE PATIENT`S BONE. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM TO DISTAL STEM D 20MM L 140MM STRAIGHT AND REVISED THE HEAD TO A SAME SIZE HEAD. THE SURGERY AS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 25328459 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 24, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED 1 YEAR AND 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY PROCEDURE DUE TO INFECTION. THE PATHOGEN WAS UNKNOWN. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24429839 ↗
  • InjuryOct 26, 2023Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 9 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE STEM AND THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE STEM IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND HEAD AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 18011655 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal Ball devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Hemi-, Femoral, Metal Ball devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page