Skip to content

TEMA Elbow 1504.14.100Recalls & reported problems

Limacorporate SPA · Humeral Stem H10 left · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TEMA Elbow (15)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08033390128827), received between Jul 13, 2026 and Jul 13, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information

    REVISION SURGERY OF ELBOW PROSTHESIS WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024 FOR UNKNOWN REASON. COMPLETE PATIENT CLINICAL HISTORY IS SUMMARIZED BELOW. PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY SURGERY IN 2006 FOR FRACTURE WHEN AN ELBOW PROSTHESIS FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER WAS IMPLANTED. FIRST REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 WITH A COMPLETE CEMENTLESS TEMA ASSEMBLY CONSISTING OF: - HUMERAL STEM #H7 LEFT (PN 1504.14.070), - HUMERAL BODY LARGE LEFT + SCREW (PN 1550.15.020), - ULNAR STEM #U6 (PN 1575.14.030), - ULNAR BODY LARGE LEFT + SCREW (PN 1552.15.020), - ULNAR LINER LARGE LEFT (PN 1560.50.020). PATIENT BONE QUALITY WAS REPORTED TO BE POOR. AFTER FEW MONTHS, SECOND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 FOR HUMERAL STEM LOOSENING (MFR. 3008021110-2026-00286) AND THE ABOVE MENTIONED HUMERAL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH: - HUMERAL STEM #H9 LEFT (PN 1504.14.090), - HUMERAL BODY LARGE LEFT (PN 1550.15.020)., NO INDICATION REGARDING THE CEMENTATION ADOPTED WAS PROVIDED. ONE MONTH LATER, ON (B)(6) 2021, PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR THE THIRD TIME (MFR. 3008021110-2026-00287) FOR LOOSENING OF THE RECENTLY IMPLANTED HUMERAL STEM #H9 WITH A BIGGER STEM (HUMERAL STEM #H10 LEFT, PN 1504.1

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 25797033 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Elbow, Constrained, Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Elbow, Constrained, Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page