Skip to content

XXL™ Esophageal M001145500Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of XXL Esophageal (10)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729163039), received between Dec 3, 2022 and Jun 18, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Leak/Splash” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Leak/Splash1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 18, 2024Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 28MAY2024. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 95% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE NON-TORTUOUS AND NON-CALCIFIC VENOUS ARTERY. A 16-2/5.8/75 XXL ESOPHAGEAL BALLOON DILATOR WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED AS USUAL AND WAS INSERTED INTO THE BODY. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR PULLED NEGATIVE ON THE BALLOON AND THE INDIFLATOR WAS FILLED WITH BLOOD. THERE WAS NO ATTEMPT TO INFLATE THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED A BALLOON PINHOLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19556757 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 3, 2022Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 25-NOV-2022. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON DAMAGE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH MAY-THURNER SYNDROME AND UNDERWENT VENOUS ANGIOPLASTY WITH INTERVENTION. THE STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE ILIAC VEIN. A 16-2/5.8/75 XXL ESOPHAGEAL BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING INFLATION, THE BALLOON KEPT LOSING PRESSURE DESPITE DISCONNECTING AND RECONNECTING THE INDEFLATOR. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED A BALLOON PINHOLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15912202 ↗

Other Dilator, esophageal devices

All Dilator, esophageal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page