Expect M00550000Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspiration Needle · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729790051), received between Mar 13, 2018 and Mar 24, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 24, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXPECT 19G EUS NEEDLE WAS USED IN THE STOMACH FUNDUS DURING A PUNCTURE UNDER ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE TIP CORE WAS FRACTURED DURING THE BIOPSY PUNCTURE AND WAS UNABLE TO PUNCTURE. ANOTHER EXPECT NEEDLE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21681687 ↗InjuryMar 13, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXPECT ¿ NEEDLE WAS USED IN THE GASTRIC WALL, DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY (EUS) PROCEDURE WITH FIDUCIALS PLACEMENT, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PROCEDURE THE NEEDLE BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S GASTRIC WALL. IT WAS REMOVED UNEVENTFULLY WITH A SNARE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXPECT¿ NEEDLE. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7335492 ↗
Other Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology devices
- EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS GF TYPE UCT180Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology5 deaths2,392 reports
- PENTAX Medical EG38-J10UTHoya Corporation · Endoscopic Ultrasound System, Gastroenterology-Urology295 reports
- EVIS EXERA II ULTRASOUND GASTROVIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS GF TYPE UCT180Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology266 reports
- PENTAX EG-3870UTKHoya Corporation · Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology164 reports
- PENTAX Medical EG36-J10URHoya Corporation · Endoscopic Ultrasound System, Gastroenterology-Urology126 reports
- PENTAX EG-3670URKHoya Corporation · Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology72 reports
- PENTAX Medical EG34-J10UHoya Corporation · Endoscopic Ultrasound System, Gastroenterology-Urology61 reports
- BALLOON MAJ-1351Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Endoscopic ultrasound system, gastroenterology-urology29 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page