Jagwire™ Revolution M00557000Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · High Performance Guidewire · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729962403), received between Jun 4, 2025 and Jul 29, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Defective Device2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Nonstandard Device1
Patient problems
- Perforation2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 29, 2025Break; Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Break; Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A JAGWIRE REVOLUTION WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE TO TREAT CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, UPON TRYING TO REMOVE THE GUIDEWIRE FROM THE TOME, RESISTANCE WAS FELT AND UPON PULLING THE WIRE, IT BROKE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CORE WIRE BROKE INTO TWO SEPARATE PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT GUIDEWIRE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22646877 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2025Defective Device; Defective Device
NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO TWO JAGWIRE REVOLUTION, DREAMTOME AND AN AUTOTOME RX 39 DEVICE THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A JAGWIRE REVOLUTION WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE TO TREAT A STONE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN COULD NOT CANNULATE WITH A DREAMTOME. THE PHYSICIAN SWITCHED TO A JAGWIRE REVOLUTION IN AN AUTOTOME RX 39. THE PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A WIRE GUIDED CANNULATION, AND THE WIRE APPEARED TO BE IN THE DUCT. WHEN THE CONTRAST WAS INJECTED, IT APPEARED THAT THE WIRE MAY HAVE PERFORATED THE DUCT. THE PHYSICIAN THEN WENT BACK TO DREAMWIRE BUT IT APPEARED TO FOLLOW THE SAME PATH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WIRE IS STIFF AND THERE IS A LACK OF FEEL IF IT IS PERFORATING. THE PROCEDURE WAS DISCONTINUED, AND THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO IR (INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY). THERE PATIENT'S CURRENT CONDITION IS GOOD AND EXPECTED TO FULLY RECOVER.
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 22146815 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2025Defective Device; Nonstandard Device; Defective Device
NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO TWO JAGWIRE REVOLUTION, DREAMTOME AND AN AUTOTOME RX 39 DEVICE THAT WERE USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A JAGWIRE REVOLUTION WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE TO TREAT A STONE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN COULD NOT CANNULATE WITH A DREAMTOME. THE PHYSICIAN SWITCHED TO A JAGWIRE REVOLUTION IN AN AUTOTOME RX 39. THE PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A WIRE GUIDED CANNULATION, AND THE WIRE APPEARED TO BE IN THE DUCT. WHEN THE CONTRAST WAS INJECTED, IT APPEARED THAT THE WIRE MAY HAVE PERFORATED THE DUCT. THE PHYSICIAN THEN WENT BACK TO DREAMWIRE BUT IT APPEARED TO FOLLOW THE SAME PATH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WIRE IS STIFF AND THERE IS A LACK OF FEEL IF IT IS PERFORATING. THE PROCEDURE WAS DISCONTINUED, AND THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO IR (INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY). THERE PATIENT'S CURRENT CONDITION IS GOOD AND EXPECTED TO FULLY RECOVER.
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 22146813 ↗
Other Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology devices
- HiWire G30474Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology82 reports
- Roadrunner G18154Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall18 reports
- Roadrunner G17542Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall9 reports
- Roadrunner G18153Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall6 reports
- Roadrunner G18155Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall3 reports
- Roadrunner G17539Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall2 reports
- Roadrunner G17540Cook Incorporated · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 recall0 reports
- Jagwire M00556580Boston Scientific Corporation · Endoscopic guidewire, gastroenterology-urology1 death49 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page