Skip to content

Medex MX448L60MGRecalls & reported problems

Icu Medical, Inc. · Class 2

All models of Medex (98)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10351688507372), received between Jul 13, 2017 and Jul 13, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Disconnection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Disconnection1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 13, 2017Disconnection; Disconnection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TUBING OF A MEDEX¿ MAGNUM¿ MICRO FLUID DELIVERY SYSTEM BECAME DISCONNECTED FROM THE PATIENT'S PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER LINE (PICC). THE DISCONNECTION OCCURRED WHERE THE 3 WAY STOPCOCK CONNECTS. THE PICC LINE WAS PLACED IN THE PATIENT'S LEFT FOREARM, AND THE IV LUMEN DEVICE TYPE WAS SINGLE. THE TUBING HAD BEEN HANGING FOR 72 HOURS WITHOUT ANY DISCONNECTIONS, THE DISCONNECTION ONLY OCCURRED WHEN TRANSFERRING THE INFANT TO BE HELD BY ITS MOTHER. NEW TUBING WAS HUNG AND TOTAL PARENTERAL NUTRITION WAS RECONNECTED TO THE PATIENT. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6711914 ↗

Other Set, administration, intravascular devices

All Set, administration, intravascular devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page