P.F.C. 86-9117Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · P.F.C. 3 Inches HEADLESS STEINMAN PIN - 10 PKG · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This DePuy headless Steinmann pin is a surgical pin used to hold bone in place during orthopedic procedures. The 38 reports mostly describe pins arriving bent or misaligned, breaking, or not fitting properly into the cutting guides, which sometimes delayed surgery. No deaths and no injuries are reported. There are no recalls naming this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 38
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 38 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295218142), received between Feb 27, 2018 and Dec 8, 2025 — classified as 38 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (17 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation17
- Device-Device Incompatibility16
- Break12
- Naturally Worn6
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions31
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- Insufficient Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 38 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIX (6) LONG FEMUR FIXATION PINS INCLUDED WITH THE EQUIPMENT WERE MISALIGNED (QUITE BENT), MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO PRECISELY ATTACH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR THE NECESSARY CUTS. THIS OCCASIONALLY CAUSED MINOR DELAYS IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AS THE PINS HAD TO BE REALIGNED WITH THE CUTTING INSTRUMENTS. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATIENT OR ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SURGICAL SCHEDULE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23751120 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIX (6) LONG FEMUR FIXATION PINS INCLUDED WITH THE EQUIPMENT WERE MISALIGNED (QUITE BENT), MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO PRECISELY ATTACH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR THE NECESSARY CUTS. THIS OCCASIONALLY CAUSED MINOR DELAYS IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AS THE PINS HAD TO BE REALIGNED WITH THE CUTTING INSTRUMENTS. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATIENT OR ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SURGICAL SCHEDULE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23751119 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIX (6) LONG FEMUR FIXATION PINS INCLUDED WITH THE EQUIPMENT WERE MISALIGNED (QUITE BENT), MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO PRECISELY ATTACH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR THE NECESSARY CUTS. THIS OCCASIONALLY CAUSED MINOR DELAYS IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AS THE PINS HAD TO BE REALIGNED WITH THE CUTTING INSTRUMENTS. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATIENT OR ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SURGICAL SCHEDULE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23751118 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIX (6) LONG FEMUR FIXATION PINS INCLUDED WITH THE EQUIPMENT WERE MISALIGNED (QUITE BENT), MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO PRECISELY ATTACH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR THE NECESSARY CUTS. THIS OCCASIONALLY CAUSED MINOR DELAYS IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AS THE PINS HAD TO BE REALIGNED WITH THE CUTTING INSTRUMENTS. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATIENT OR ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SURGICAL SCHEDULE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23751117 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIX (6) LONG FEMUR FIXATION PINS INCLUDED WITH THE EQUIPMENT WERE MISALIGNED (QUITE BENT), MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO PRECISELY ATTACH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR THE NECESSARY CUTS. THIS OCCASIONALLY CAUSED MINOR DELAYS IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AS THE PINS HAD TO BE REALIGNED WITH THE CUTTING INSTRUMENTS. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATIENT OR ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SURGICAL SCHEDULE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23751115 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE SIX (6) LONG FEMUR FIXATION PINS INCLUDED WITH THE EQUIPMENT WERE MISALIGNED (QUITE BENT), MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO PRECISELY ATTACH THE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR THE NECESSARY CUTS. THIS OCCASIONALLY CAUSED MINOR DELAYS IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AS THE PINS HAD TO BE REALIGNED WITH THE CUTTING INSTRUMENTS. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS FOR THE PATIENT OR ANY ALTERATIONS TO THE SURGICAL SCHEDULE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23751112 ↗MalfunctionNov 7, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 3 FOR (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED THAT, UPON OPENING THE PFC 3INHDLES STEINMN PIN PKG10, THE LEFT FIFTH FEMORAL PIN WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. DURING THE SURGERY, THE PINS WERE OBSERVED TO BE SEVERELY BENT, MAKING INSERTION INTO THE CUTTING GUIDES DIFFICULT. THERE WERE NO DELAYS OR COMPLICATIONS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE TEAM ATTEMPTED TO SEPARATE THE MOST BENT PINS AND PROCEEDED WITH THOSE IN THE BEST CONDITION. THE TEST WAS NOT PERFORMED BECAUSE THE PATIENT WAS RIGHT-HANDED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM OR SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23498895 ↗MalfunctionNov 7, 2025Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 3 FOR (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED THAT, UPON OPENING THE PFC 3INHDLES STEINMN PIN PKG10, THE LEFT FIFTH FEMORAL PIN WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. DURING THE SURGERY, THE PINS WERE OBSERVED TO BE SEVERELY BENT, MAKING INSERTION INTO THE CUTTING GUIDES DIFFICULT. THERE WERE NO DELAYS OR COMPLICATIONS DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE TEAM ATTEMPTED TO SEPARATE THE MOST BENT PINS AND PROCEEDED WITH THOSE IN THE BEST CONDITION. THE TEST WAS NOT PERFORMED BECAUSE THE PATIENT WAS RIGHT-HANDED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM OR SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23498889 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT A LONG PIN FOR FIXATION OF THE FEMUR IS MISSING. THE TIBIAL IMPACTOR IS FRACTURED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22907318 ↗MalfunctionFeb 10, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TKA WITH THE PIN FOR FEMUR. WHEN THE PIN WAS USED WITH THE PIN ADAPTER (NON-JJ PRODUCT) FOR FEMORAL FIXATION, THE PIN WAS BROKEN OFF FROM THE ROOT AND REMAINED IN THE ADAPTER. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANY SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21349999 ↗MalfunctionMay 8, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ATTUNE KNEE, IN WHICH HAS REMISSION LONG PINS, WHICH AT THE TIME OF OPENING DEVICE AND ALREADY WITH ANESTHETIZED PATIENT IT WAS EVIDENT THAT THE PINS THAT ARE CRITICAL PIECES OF INSTRUMENTS FOR THE REALIZATION OF A KNEE PROSTHESIS, WERE MISSING. THE SPECIALIST HAD TO WAIT ABOUT 1H WHILE OTHER PINS WERE ADMITTED TO THE INSTITUTION.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19267822 ↗MalfunctionJan 19, 2024Break; Break
DURING THE PROCEDURE A LONG PIN WAS SPLIT FOR FEMUR FIXATION WHICH DID NOT PRODUCE ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT, THIS EVENT ANNOYANCE OF THE DOCTOR COULD FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES WITH OTHER PINS THAT BRINGS THE SYSTEM. THE PROBLEM CAUSED DELAY AS IT HAD TO REMOVE THE PIN BROKEN AND PLACE ONE IN GOOD CONDITION. IT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18542469 ↗MalfunctionNov 16, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: A. WAS THERE A SURGICAL DELAY? IF YES, WHAT IS THE DURATION OF THE DELAY? NO. B. WAS/WERE THERE ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE/S THAT AFFECTED THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE REPORTED EVENT? NO. C. DID THIS EVENT HAPPEN INTRA-OP? YES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18149601 ↗MalfunctionOct 20, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FIXATION PIN BROKE DURING KNEE SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17979052 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
4 LONG PINS FOR FIXING FEMUR ARE TWISTED IN THE EQUIPMENT, WHICH MADE THE PROCEDURE DIFFICULT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17799514 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
4 LONG PINS FOR FIXING FEMUR ARE TWISTED IN THE EQUIPMENT, WHICH MADE THE PROCEDURE DIFFICULT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17799463 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
4 LONG PINS FOR FIXING FEMUR ARE TWISTED IN THE EQUIPMENT, WHICH MADE THE PROCEDURE DIFFICULT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17799402 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation
FOUR LONG PINS FOR FIXING FEMUR ARE TWISTED IN THE EQUIPMENT, WHICH MADE THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17799349 ↗MalfunctionJun 5, 2023Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT IN QUESTION WAS USED IN THE SURGERY VIA TKA. IN THE SURGERY, THE STYMAN PIN WAS NOT INSERTED INTO THE PINHOLE ON ONE SIDE OF THE FEMORAL MAJOR SIZER ANTERIOR REFERENCE. THE PIN WAS INSERTED MANUALLY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHIN 30MINUITES SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17059719 ↗MalfunctionMay 26, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PIN WAS DAMAGED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17010664 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THE TEST INSERTS HAVE FAILED IN THE COUPLING (SPRING) PART FOR THE TEST HEIGHTS AND THE PIN IS TWISTED. NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16520323 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation
INTRASURGICALLY, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THE LONG PIN FOR FEMORAL FIXATION WAS TWISTED; IT COULD NOT BE USED. IF THIS INSTRUMENT REMAINS SO INSIDE THE EQUIPMENT, IT COULD HAVE CAUSED FAILURES IN THE INSTRUMENT FIXATION AND DISCOMFORT FOR THE SPECIALIST. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT OR DELAYS IN THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16302899 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15576012 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSTRUMENT WAS BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15575019 ↗MalfunctionOct 11, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT INSTRUMENT BROKE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15574322 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page