SPECIALIST 96-6321Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · SPECIALIST 2 TIBIAL CUTTING BLOCK 3 DEG · Class 1
All models of SPECIALIST (80)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295247852), received between Feb 18, 2019 and Mar 1, 2024 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation4
- Device-Device Incompatibility3
- Break1
- Incorrect Measurement1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Mechanical Jam1
- Naturally Worn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- Not Applicable1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 1, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW MECHANISM ON THE ALIGNMENT DEVICE THAT CONNECTS TO CUTTING BLOCK WOULDN¿T UNSCREW. THIS IS PREVENTING THE CUTTING BLOCK FROM BEING RELEASED. THERE WAS NO CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE EVENT AND SURGERY WAS NOT PROLONGED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18815248 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation
THEY WERE NOT USED DURING SURGERY AND WHERE NOTICED AS BROKEN WHEN THE SETS WERE OPENED. NO PATIENT HARM. NO FRAGMENT RETENTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18099763 ↗MalfunctionNov 4, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CUTTING BLOCK IS STUCK TO THE PROXIMAL EXTRAMEDULLARY ALIGNMENT GUIDE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15730240 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2022Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement
INSTRUMENT DOES NOT MEASURE PROPERLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14237860 ↗MalfunctionDec 3, 2019Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Deformation; Material Twisted/Bent
TODAY, A PATIENT SURGERY WAS SCHEDULED AT THE (B)(6), IN FULL SURGERY WITH AN OPEN PATIENT THE TIBIAL CUTTING GUIDE NO. 966321 NUMBER 3 DID NOT ENTER THE LANE OF THE EXTERNAL CUTTING GUIDE 966311. DESPITE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THEY FAILED TO ASSEMBLE. THE SURGEON HAD TO MAKE THE CUT BY HOLDING THIS GUIDE FREEHAND SINCE HE HAD NO OTHER OPTION, HE WAS WITH AN OPEN PATIENT AND UNFORTUNATELY THE CUT WENT WRONG. THE SURGERY HAD AN ADDITIONAL DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 01 HOUR AND 15 MINUTES THAN USUAL.
Patient problems: Not Applicable
MAUDE report 9402337 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2019Material Deformation; Naturally Worn; Material Deformation; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SPD THAT THE 3 DEGREE TIBIAL CUTTING BLOCK WAS WORN DOWN AND HAD WEAR ON THE EDGES CREATING SHARP CORNERS ON THE CUTTING SLOT. THIS IS A SAFETY HAZARD AND NEEDS TO BE REPLACED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8400352 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2019Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SPD REFUSED TO PROCESS 3 DEGREE TIBIA CUTTING BLOCK BECAUSE IT WAS A SAFETY HAZARD. THE CORNER OF THE CUTTING SLOT HAD A SHARP EDGE OF METAL DUE TO WEAR.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8358437 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2019Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
UPON ENTERING THE SURGERY IT IS EVIDENT THAT THE EXTRAMEDULLARY GUIDE OF TIBIA WAS SPLIT PIECE AND TIGHTEN THE CUTTING GUIDE N3. THE EQUIPMENT WAS DELIVERED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO DISMANTLE, BUT WHEN THE SAFETY WAS BROKEN, IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8347329 ↗
Other INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC devices
- SIGMA LCS 9505-01-230Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC95 reports
- ATTUNE 2544-00-522Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC58 reports
- SIGMA LCS 9505-01-229Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC56 reports
- SIGMA 2024-40-100Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC43 reports
- ATTUNE 2545-00-158Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC41 reports
- ATTUNE 2545-00-156Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC41 reports
- SIGMA 2024-40-200Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC40 reports
- ATTUNE 2545-00-155Depuy (Ireland) · INSTRUMENT, CUTTING, ORTHOPEDIC39 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page