FREESTYLE® FR995-19 (UDI 10681490265888)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · VALVE FR995-19 FREESTYLE AOR US · Class 3 · Implant
All models of FREESTYLE (33)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 19
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 19
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 19 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10681490265888), received between Sep 20, 2018 and Jan 5, 2026 — classified as 19 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (14 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information14
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Off-Label Use2
- Degraded1
- Intravalvular regurgitation1
Patient problems
- No Information8
- Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation6
- Insufficient Information5
- Aortic Valve Stenosis2
- Aortic Insufficiency1
- Aortic Regurgitation1
- Pulmonary Valve Stenosis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 19 most recent of 19 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT 11 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN THE PULMONARY POSITION, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED IN THE SAME POSITION WITH A 29MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23955753 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2023Intravalvular regurgitation; Intravalvular regurgitation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 16 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT IS BEING EVALUATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS REPORTED AS SEVERE AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 18330135 ↗InjuryJan 16, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 11 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS SEVERE AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY (AI). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 16178914 ↗InjuryNov 18, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 12 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT IS BEING EVAL UATED FOR A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT. THE REASON FOR EVALUATION WAS REPORTED AS AORTIC REGURGITATION. NO INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. SUBSEQUENTLY, 5 DAYS LATER, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. NO ADDIT IONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 15827832 ↗InjuryOct 26, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN THE PULMONARY POSITION IN A 1 YEAR 4 MONTHS OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 27MM VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15675795 ↗InjuryAug 10, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 20 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS AORTIC STENOSIS AND AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 15200762 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE-IN-VALVE PROCEDURE WAS ATTEMPTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED DUE TO PATIENT ANATOMY. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS LOW FLOW LOW GRADIENT AORTIC STENOSIS AND MILD REGURGITATION. THE BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. SUBSEQUENTLY, 11 DAYS LATER, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Aortic Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 15015091 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN THE PULMONARY POSITION, IN A (B)(6) PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 25MM VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14315834 ↗InjuryApr 30, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 19 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 21MM BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 11753829 ↗InjuryMar 31, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN THE PULMONARY POSITION OF A (B)(6) PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Pulmonary Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 11599909 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 13 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED AS SEVERE AORTIC REGURGITATION. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation
MAUDE report 11497875 ↗InjuryAug 5, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 12 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN THE PULMONARY POSITION IN A (B)(6) YEAR OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 25MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. PER THE SURGEON, "THERE IS NO COMPLAINT, THIS IS A PEDS [PEDIATRIC] /CONGENITAL CASE". NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10368678 ↗InjuryMay 19, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 14 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN THE PULMONARY POSITION OF A (B)(6) YEAR OLD PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE OF A DIFFERENT MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10070596 ↗InjuryMay 4, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE PATIENT'S DAUGHTER THAT 7 YEARS AND 8 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN DEVICE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10020476 ↗InjuryFeb 4, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 19 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, IT WAS REPLACED VALVE-IN-VALVE WITH A 23MM TRANSCATHETER VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Regurgitation; No Information
MAUDE report 9664801 ↗InjuryJan 3, 2020Degraded; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Degraded; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 7 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE VALVE-IN-VALVE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Aortic Insufficiency; No Information
MAUDE report 9546121 ↗InjurySep 6, 2019Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 YEARS AND 10 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN THE PULMONARY POSITION OF A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, A TRANSCATHETER PULMONARY VALVE (TPV) WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR VALVE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8969280 ↗InjurySep 6, 2019Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 14 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 19MM BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IN THE PULMONARY POSITION OF A (B)(6)-YEAR-OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS REPLACED VALVE-IN-VALVE WITH A TRANSCATHETER VALVE DEPLOYED TO 22MM. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8969028 ↗InjurySep 20, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 13 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IN AN 11 YEAR OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, A TRANSCATHETER PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE (TPBV) WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 7896196 ↗
Other heart-valve, non-allograft tissue devices
- INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE 11500AEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Heart-Valve, Non-Allograft Tissue2 deaths404 reports
- INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE 11500AEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Heart-Valve, Non-Allograft Tissue385 reports
- PERCEVAL PVS23Corcym Canada Corp · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue26 deaths337 reports
- MOSAIC® 305C23Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue327 reports
- MOSAIC® 305C25Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue2 deaths324 reports
- FREESTYLE® FR995-27Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue2 deaths318 reports
- FREESTYLE® FR995-29Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue288 reports
- FREESTYLE® FR99525Medtronic, Inc. · heart-valve, non-allograft tissue2 deaths280 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page