MONOCRYL Y215HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Undyed Monofilament (Poliglecaprone 25), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031058583), received between Apr 11, 2023 and Mar 5, 2024 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K964072); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Material Separation3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 5, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT A ROBOTIC PROSTATECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE AND BARBED SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THREE SUTURES BROKE WHILE SUTURING. ONE STRATAFIX DURING THE URETHROVESICLE ANASTOMOSIS, ONE MONOCRYL DURING THE OVER SEW OF THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE URETHRA AND THE BLADDER, AND A DYED MONOCRYL WHILE SUTURING THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ANASTOMOSIS OVER SEW BETWEEN THE URETHRA AND THE BLADDER. FOR EACH, ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO CONTINUE WITH THE PROCEDURE. LEAK TEST WAS PREFORMED AND NO LEAKS WERE FOUND. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO FURTHER REPORTED ISSUES. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18838621 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE THREAD BROKE, NO EXCESSIVE FORCED WAS USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18748146 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE ON THE SUTURE BREAKS. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18659581 ↗MalfunctionApr 11, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE THREE TIMES IN A ROW, DURING ONE EVENT. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16713493 ↗MalfunctionApr 11, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE THREE TIMES IN A ROW, DURING ONE EVENT. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16713488 ↗MalfunctionApr 11, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE THREE TIMES IN A ROW, DURING ONE EVENT. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16713481 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K964072. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0487-2025 · Oct 8, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMONOCRYL" (poliglecaprone 25) Suture REF Y936H MONOCRYL" Sutures are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in cardiovascular and
- Z-2148-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMONOCRYL (poliglecaprone 25) Suture - Intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation where an absorbable material is indicated PRODUCT CODE: Y315H Y345
Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC devices
- MONOCRYL Y426HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC141 reports
- MONOCRYL Y936HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC1 recall66 reports
- MONOCRYL Y923HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC111 reports
- MONOCRYL Y427HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC1 recall53 reports
- MONOCRYL Y496GEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC86 reports
- MONOCRYL Y943GEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC77 reports
- MONOCRYL Y416HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC1 recall13 reports
- MONOCRYL Y935HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC1 recall8 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page