Skip to content

MONOCRYL Y434HRecalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Undyed Monofilament (Poliglecaprone 25), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031059191), received between Dec 15, 2020 and Aug 27, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (5 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K964072); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 3 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation5
  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. WHEN SUTURING UMBILICUS WITH SUTURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE TOWARDS TOP IN TWO PIECES. SUTURE INSPECTED WITH MD, SCRUB, AND CIRCULATOR AND APPEARED TO BE MATCHING WHOLE PIECES. MD VERBALIZED IT ONLY BROKE IN TWO PIECES. NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22906715 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 25, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE-NEEDLE WAS COME OFF WHEN PULLED IT OUT. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20061115 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 25, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE-NEEDLE WAS COME OFF WHEN PULLED IT OUT. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20061114 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 25, 2024Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE-NEEDLE WAS COME OFF WHEN PULLED IT OUT. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20061113 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 28, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF FROM THE SUTURE AND EMBEDDED INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S LEG. SURGEON WAS ABLE REMOVE THE NEEDLE IN ITS ENTIRETY. NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16061992 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 15, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2020 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE GOT DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11014020 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K964072. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0487-2025 · Oct 8, 2024 · Open, Classified
    MONOCRYL" (poliglecaprone 25) Suture REF Y936H MONOCRYL" Sutures are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in cardiovascular and
  • Z-2148-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, Classified
    MONOCRYL (poliglecaprone 25) Suture - Intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation where an absorbable material is indicated PRODUCT CODE: Y315H Y345

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page