Skip to content

MONOCRYL Y845GRecalls & reported problems

Ethicon, LLC · Undyed Monofilament (Poliglecaprone 25), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MONOCRYL (127)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031059740), received between Oct 28, 2019 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K964072); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Component Misassembled1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 9, 2026Break

    It was reported that a patient underwent a C-section on an unknown date and suture was used. During the procedure, the suture broke and was unable to be located. An X-Ray was done and the patient had be reopened tolocate the suture. Additional information was requested.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 50694847 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 1, 2022Component Misassembled; Component Misassembled

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2022 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE SIZE ON THE PACKAGING WAS 16MM, BUT THE SURGEONS BELIEVED THE NEEDLE WAS 13MM. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14885279 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 27, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A REMOVAL OF A BREAST LESION ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE AT THE SWAGE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13087720 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST EXCISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF INTO CUSTOMER AND X-RAY HAD TO COME IN TO TAKE PICTURE TO RETRIEVE NEEDLE. A NEW SUTURE WAS OPENED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. .

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10359455 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A THORACIC TUMOR EXCISION LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE KEPT BREAKING. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9245205 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A THORACIC TUMOR EXCISION LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IN (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE KEPT BREAKING. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9245198 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K964072. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-0487-2025 · Oct 8, 2024 · Open, Classified
    MONOCRYL" (poliglecaprone 25) Suture REF Y936H MONOCRYL" Sutures are indicated for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in cardiovascular and
  • Z-2148-2024 · May 10, 2024 · Open, Classified
    MONOCRYL (poliglecaprone 25) Suture - Intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation where an absorbable material is indicated PRODUCT CODE: Y315H Y345

Other SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC devices

All SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page