PDS Z126HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Violet Monofilament (Polydioxanone), Absorbable Synthetic Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PDS (224)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031060203), received between Jan 31, 2018 and May 15, 2026 — classified as 15 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (9 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break9
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem5
- Material Separation5
- Detachment Of Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions14
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 15, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE OPERATION, THE NEEDLE AND THREAD WERE SEPARATED WHEN THE THREAD WAS REMOVED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25187505 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IN THE CLINIC IT IS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGICAL PROCEDURES THE NEEDLE OF THE SUTURE IS BROKEN. IT IS SUSPECTED THAT THE PRODUCT IS NOT AUTHENTIC FROM J&J. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23769404 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IN THE CLINIC IT IS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGICAL PROCEDURES THE NEEDLE OF THE SUTURE IS BROKEN. IT IS SUSPECTED THAT THE PRODUCT IS NOT AUTHENTIC FROM J&J. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23769397 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IN THE CLINIC IT IS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGICAL PROCEDURES THE NEEDLE OF THE SUTURE IS BROKEN. IT IS SUSPECTED THAT THE PRODUCT IS NOT AUTHENTIC FROM J&J. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23768309 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Break; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. IN THE CLINIC IT IS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGICAL PROCEDURES, THE NEEDLE OF THE SUTURE IS BROKEN. IT IS SUSPECTED THAT THE PRODUCT IS NOT AUTHENTIC FROM J&J. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23768305 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RHINOPLASTY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED WHEN WANTING TO USE THE SUTURES, THE UNION BETWEEN THE NEEDLE AND THE STRAND (NEEDLE ANCHOR) WAS BROKEN. THIS HAPPENED IN 3 SUTURES. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22044036 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RHINOPLASTY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED WHEN WANTING TO USE THE SUTURES, THE UNION BETWEEN THE NEEDLE AND THE STRAND (NEEDLE ANCHOR) WAS BROKEN. THIS HAPPENED IN 3 SUTURES. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22044020 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A RHINOPLASTY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED WHEN WANTING TO USE THE SUTURES, THE UNION BETWEEN THE NEEDLE AND THE STRAND (NEEDLE ANCHOR) WAS BROKEN. THIS HAPPENED IN 3 SUTURES. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22044016 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2025Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. BEFORE USE ON THE PATIENT, THE QR CODE OF THE SUTURE DOES NOT WORK. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22039189 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE IOSLATED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22035877 ↗MalfunctionJan 28, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SUTURING PROCESS, THE NEEDLE BROKE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21253131 ↗MalfunctionDec 26, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE BROKE DURING SURGERY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21019808 ↗MalfunctionDec 26, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE BROKE DURING SURGERY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21019797 ↗MalfunctionDec 21, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE BROKE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13057783 ↗MalfunctionJan 31, 2018Break; Detachment Of Device Component; Break; Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE FOR CHOLEDOCHOLITH AND STENOSIS OF THE COMMON BILE DUCT AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE SURGERY, THE COMMON BILE DUCT EXCEPT FOR THE STENOSED PART WAS RESECTED ON THE SIDE OF THE LIVER. THEN, THE BILE DUCT AND DUODENUM WERE ANASTOMOSED. DURING THE ANASTOMOSIS, THE SURGEON HELD THE NEEDLE TIP AFTER PLACING A FEW STITCHES. AT THAT TIME, THE NEEDLE DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. IT IS SUPPOSED THAT THE NEEDLE TIP BROKE WHEN THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. WHEN THE NEEDLE WAS RETRIEVED, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE NEEDLE TIP HAD BEEN BROKEN OFF. THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE NEEDLE TIP HAS NOT BEEN RETRIEVED YET. DURING THE OPERATION, X-RAYS WERE TAKEN BUT THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE NEEDLE TIP WAS NOT OBSERVED. THUS, THE SURGEON JUDGED THAT THE BROKEN PIECE WAS NOT RETAINED IN THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE SURGEON OPINES THAT THE NEEDLE TIP WAS BROKEN BECAUSE HE/SHE HELD THE NEEDLE AT ITS TIP. THE SURGEON JUDGED THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE NEEDLE TIP WAS NOT RETAINED IN THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT, AND NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT SCHEDULED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7232893 ↗
Other SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE devices
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A405Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE617 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A400Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE485 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A401Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE446 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A301Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE443 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP2B405Ethicon, LLC · Suture, surgical, absorbable, polydioxanone406 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A406Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE339 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A404Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death319 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1B420Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death229 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page