PDS Z371TRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon, LLC · Violet Monofilament (Polydioxanone), Absorbable Synthetic Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PDS (224)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031060821), received between May 3, 2019 and Oct 17, 2025 — classified as 12 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break10
- Material Separation2
- Component Missing1
- Material Discolored1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- Insufficient Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 17, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE IN 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR PER CUSTOMER THAT THEY HAVE ENCOUNTERED A SAFETY ISSUE IN THE OR WITH AN ETHICON SUTURE, THE SUTURE BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT DURING USE, AND IT DID HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN SUTURE WAS THROWN AWAY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23328071 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT AND AUTOGRAFT BONE GRAFTING TO THE LEFT ACETABULUM ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS SUTURING, THE POINTY PART OF THE SUTURE BROKE OFF. EVERYONE WAS AWARE. X-RAY WAS CALLED AND CONFIRMED THERE WAS NO RETAINED ITEM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23089557 ↗MalfunctionAug 20, 2025Break; Component Missing
WHILE THE SURGEON WAS SUTURING - THE POINTY PART OF THE SUTURE (LOT: 106G3D - REF: Z371T ) BROKE OFF - EVERYONE WAS AWARE. X-RAY WAS CALLED AND CONFIRMED "NO RETAINED ITEM".
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 22850178 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SPINAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, SUTURE THREAD BROKE DURING THE SPINAL ARTHRODESIS PROCEDURE AT ITS FIRST FIXATION. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21864669 ↗MalfunctionJul 13, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OPEN VENTRAL HERNIA PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE STRANDS BROKE MIDWAY WHILE TYING A KNOT. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12157791 ↗MalfunctionJul 12, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE BROKE WHILE TYING THE SCARTUS FACIA. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12151059 ↗MalfunctionMar 12, 2021Break; Material Discolored; Break; Material Discolored
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE BROKE. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11477212 ↗MalfunctionJul 29, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON UNKNOWN DATE AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE NEEDLE HAD BEEN DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8838419 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2019 AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. DURING SUTURING OF THE FASCIA, A TIP OF THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF AND WAS NOT FOUND. AP AND LATERAL ABDOMINAL X-RAYS WERE NEGATIVE FOR NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8818382 ↗MalfunctionJul 8, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED VIA VOLUNTARY FACILITY MEDWATCH FORM THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LAP-ASSISTED SIGMOID COLECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE NEEDLE TIP BROKE OFF INTO THE NEEDLE HOLDER. BOTH PIECES OF THE DEVICE WERE RETRIEVED AND REMOVED FROM THE FIELD. TWO NEEDLES WERE OPENED AND IT IS UNSURE WHICH LOT NUMBER BROKE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8767335 ↗MalfunctionJun 5, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A HEMORRHOIDECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2019 AND SUTURE WAS USED. WHILE SUTURING, THE END OF THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF IN THE NEEDLE DRIVER. BOTH PIECES OF THE NEEDLE WERE REMOVED FROM THE STERILE FIELD. NO ADVERSE PATIENT OUTCOME REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8673080 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. IT WAS UNKNOWN WHAT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8579248 ↗
Other SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE devices
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A405Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE617 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A400Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE485 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A401Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE446 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A301Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE443 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP2B405Ethicon, LLC · Suture, surgical, absorbable, polydioxanone406 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A406Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE339 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A404Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death319 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1B420Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death229 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page