PDS Z422HRecalls & reported problems
Ethicon Inc. · Clear Monofilament (Polydioxanone), Absorbable Surgical Suture · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705031060890), received between Aug 3, 2021 and Jun 4, 2024 — classified as 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Aug 10, 2023Open, Classified
Internal testing on returned product from this lot confirmed that some PDS" II (polydioxanone) Sutures from this lot did not meet tensile strength requirement.
Z-2617-2023 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break6
- Material Separation5
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Insufficient Information2
- Laceration(s)1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 4, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CAESAREAN SECTION ON (B)(6) 2024 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN AT THE SWAGE PART. THE OPERATION TIME WAS NOT EXTENDED. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19463643 ↗MalfunctionNov 8, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, THE NEEDLE WAS BROKEN AT SWAGE DURING USE. THE OPERATION TIME WAS EXTENDED WITHIN 30 MINUTES. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18093379 ↗MalfunctionMay 12, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS DETACHED FROM THE SUTURE WHEN PUTTING THE FIRST STITCH. IT WAS NOT A CONTROL RELEASE NEEDLE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16921054 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS NOTED POST-OP THE SUTURE BROKE. THE CAT HAD TO HAVE A SECOND SURGERY TO REPAIR WHERE THE SUTURE BROKE. THERE WERE NO OTHER PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13726319 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. IT WAS NOTED POST-OP THE SUTURE BROKE. THE CAT HAD TO HAVE A SECOND SURGERY TO REPAIR WHERE THE SUTURE BROKE. THERE WERE NO OTHER PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13726271 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2022Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ANIMAL UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. THE SUTURE WAS NOTED TO BE BROKEN POST-OP. A SECOND PROCEDURE WAS REQUIRED TO REPAIR WHERE THE SUTURE BROKE. THERE WERE NO OTHER PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Laceration(s)
MAUDE report 13726262 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CESAREAN SECTION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. CHANGED ANOTHER ONE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12836284 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A CESAREAN SECTION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE DETACHED FROM THE NEEDLE. CHANGED ANOTHER ONE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12836260 ↗MalfunctionNov 12, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 AND THE SUTURE WAS USED. INTRA-OP, THE SUTURE HAD BEEN BROKEN. THE OPERATION TIME WAS EXTENDED WITHIN 30 MINUTES. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12804813 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST PROCEDURE LIFT/REDUCTION ON 7/8/2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS TORN. IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT THE SUTURE SEPARATED FROM NEEDLE ENTIRELY. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12267649 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST PROCEDURE LIFT/REDUCTION ON (B)(6) 2021 AND SUTURE WAS USED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUTURE WAS TORN. IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT THE SUTURE SEPARATED FROM NEEDLE ENTIRELY. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12267608 ↗
Other SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE devices
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A405Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE617 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A400Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE485 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A401Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE446 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A301Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE443 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP2B405Ethicon, LLC · Suture, surgical, absorbable, polydioxanone406 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A406Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE339 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1A404Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death319 reports
- STRATAFIX SXPP1B420Ethicon, LLC · SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE1 death229 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page