BRITE TIP 401835MRecalls & reported problems
Cordis US Corp. · SI BRITE TIP 8F 35CM STR · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705032000390), received between Feb 16, 2022 and Feb 16, 2022 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 16, 2022Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
AS REPORTED, AFTER REMOVING THE A 8F 35CM STR SI BRITE TIP SHEATH AND THE DISTAL END WAS CHECKED A FRAYED DAMAGE WAS CONFIRMED AT THE TIP PART. THE DAMAGE WAS NOTICED IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE SHEATH WAS USED TO REMOVE THE OPTEASE FILTER AND WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THEREFORE, IT WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW RECOMMENDED UNKNOWN SYSTEM AND THE FILTER WAS REMOVED. ¿REGARDING THE REMOVAL METHOD THIS WAS NOT THE RECOMMENDED, BUT THE DOCTOR DID IT EVEN THOUGH HE KNEW THE RISK OF TROUBLE.¿ THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND PREPPED AS PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE IN THE LAB. NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED WHEN THE DEVICE WAS TAKEN OUT OF THE PACKAGE. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY EXPERIENCED IN PREPPING THE DEVICE. THE ACCESS SITE WAS THE FEMORAL ARTERIES. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE/TARGET LESION WAS THE INFERIOR VENA CAVA FOR FILTER REMOVAL. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY TRACKING THROUGH THE VASCULATURE AND NO UNUSUAL FORCE WAS USED AT ANY TIME DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED INTACT FROM THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AS THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED AT THE HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13546796 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page