RAIN Sheath Transradial 506610NRecalls & reported problems
Cordis US Corp. · 6F10CM NW RADIAL · Class 2
All models of RAIN Sheath Transradial (6)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705032082167), received between Jul 6, 2021 and Jul 6, 2021 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 6, 2021Fracture; Fracture
AS REPORTED, THAT DURING A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION (LHC) PROCEDURE, THE DOCTOR ATTEMPTED TO GAIN ACCESS INTO THE RADIAL ARTERY AND WHEN HE TRIED TO INSERT THE WIRE OF 6F 10CM TRANSRADIAL RAIN SHEATH INTRODUCER IT WOULD ONLY GO SO FAR AND THEN NOT ADVANCE ANYMORE. THEY TRIED GAINING ACCESS FOR APPROXIMATE 20 MINUTES. WHEN THEY TRIED TO REMOVE THE WIRE THROUGH THE NEEDLE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WIRE WAS STUCK AND WOULD NOT COME OUT. ANOTHER DOCTOR WAS EVENTUALLY CALLED IN TO THE ROOM TO TRY TO ASSIST. AT SOME POINT THE WIRE WAS REMOVED, BUT THE TIP OF THE WIRE HAD BROKEN OFF AND THE NEW DISTAL END HAD SHEARED. A VASCULAR SURGEON WAS CALLED IN TO TRY AND RETRIEVE THE DISTAL TIP BUT WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL. THEY PERFORMED A CUT DOWN OF THE ARTERY AND AS REPORTED BY THE TECH, THE DISTAL TIP WAS NOT VISIBLE IN THE ARTERY BUT WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE MUSCLE. ANOTHER NURSE IN THE ROOM HAD THE SAME ACCOUNT OF THE PROCEDURE, HOWEVER, THE VASCULAR SURGEON DID NOT DICTATE THAT IN HIS NOTES. THE PATIENT WAS OK AND WENT HOME THE SAME DAY. THEREFORE, THE LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION (LHC) PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY GOING IN THROUGH THE FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS. THE OPERATOR WAS TRAINED TO THE TRANSRADIA
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12121771 ↗
Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices
- VIZIGO D138502Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls4 deaths2,839 reports
- VIZIGO D138501Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER2 recalls2 deaths2,005 reports
- Swartz™ 407451St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER5 deaths728 reports
- Edwards eSheath+ Introducer set 914ESPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Introducer, Catheter22 deaths532 reports
- Fast-Cath™ 406849St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER420 reports
- VIZIGO D138503Biosense Webster Inc · INTRODUCER, CATHETER362 reports
- Agilis™ G408318St. Jude Medical, Inc. · INTRODUCER, CATHETER333 reports
- Agilis™ NxT Steerable Introducer Dual-Reach™ SI-1371-MSt. Jude Medical, Inc. · Introducer, catheter1 death301 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page