Skip to content

EXPEDIUM 179912745Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · EXPEDIUM SPINE SYSTEM POLYAXIAL SCREW 6.35 x 7 x 45mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of EXPEDIUM (291)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034086644), received between Aug 22, 2019 and Jun 12, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Twisted/Bent” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Twisted/Bent3
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 12, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 THE PATIENT HAD FUSION SURGERY AT T12-L1 AND A DEPUY EXPEDIUM WAS THE HARDWARE USED IN HER BACK. ON (B)(6) 2024 HER PROVIDERS REALIZED THAT THE HARDWARE HAD FAILED DUE TO "STRIPPED SCREWS" AND REVISION OF THE SURGERY HAD TO BE DONE TO T12-L1 AND TO THE NEXT LEVEL UP WHICH IS THE L1-L2, CAUSING SERIOUS INJURIES TO PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES UNKNOWN NUMBER OF DEVICES. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED FOR REPORTING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22194787 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 THE PATIENT HAD FUSION SURGERY AT T12-L1 AND A DEPUY EXPEDIUM WAS THE HARDWARE USED IN HER BACK. ON JANUARY 10, 2024 HER PROVIDERS REALIZED THAT THE HARDWARE HAD FAILED DUE TO "STRIPPED SCREWS" AND REVISION OF THE SURGERY HAD TO BE DONE TO T12-L1 AND TO THE NEXT LEVEL UP WHICH IS THE L1-L2, CAUSING SERIOUS INJURIES TO PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES UNKNOWN NUMBER OF DEVICES. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED FOR REPORTING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22194717 ↗
  • InjuryOct 23, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 THE PATIENT HAD FUSION SURGERY AT T12-L1 AND A DEPUY EXPEDIUM WAS THE HARDWARE USED IN HER BACK. ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT'S PROVIDERS REALIZED THAT THE HARDWARE HAD FAILED DUE TO "STRIPPED SCREWS" AND REVISION OF THE SURGERY HAD TO BE DONE TO T12-L1 AND TO THE NEXT LEVEL UP WHICH IS THE L1-L2, CAUSING SERIOUS INJURIES TO PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20513314 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2019Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2109, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY DUE TO THE LEFT SIDE L4, L5, S1, AND LATERAL CONNECTOR LOCKING CAP POPPED OFF AND WERE REPLACED WITH S1 SCREW WITH LARGER DIAMETER SCREW AND NEW LOCKING CAPS. ON (B)(6) 2017, THE PATIENT HAD T5-PELVIS FUSION. PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. PATIENT OUTCOME IS UNKNOWN. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES FIVE (5) DEVICES.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8922607 ↗

Other Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation devices

All Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page