Skip to content

VIPER 286705230Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Spine, LLC · VIPER SYSTEM GUIDEWIRE, SHARP AND DISPOSABLE 1.45mm · Class 1

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034213699), received between May 12, 2022 and Aug 20, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration4
  • Break1
  • Entrapment of Device1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available4
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2025Break; Entrapment of Device; Break; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR REQUESTED THE SYSTEM TO STABILIZE A PELVIC FRACTURE. SURGEON INSERTED K-WIRE INTO THE PELVIS WITH K-WIRE POWER DRIVER TO ESTABLISH TRAJECTORY FOR THE TAP AND SCREW. WHEN THE SURGEON WAS TAPPING OVER THE K-WIRE, THE K-WIRE WIRE BROKE IN THE PELVIS. SURGEON AND HIS FELLOW ATTEMPTED TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PIECE BUT WERE UNABLE TO. SURGEON PROCEEDED TO PLACE THE SCREWS AND SECURE ROD TO STABILIZE THE PELVIC FRACTURE. SURGEON MADE THE DECISION TO LEAVE THE SEGMENT OF K-WIRE AS IT WAS CONTAINED WITHIN BONE IN THE PELVIS. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22848333 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2022Migration; Migration

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN AUSTRIA AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TEST PHASE WITH THE PERCUTANEOUS STABILIZATION SYSTEM "VIPER PRIME" IN COMBINATION WITH THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM FROM BRAINLAB IN THE CONTEXT OF A PATIENT-SPECIFIC PATIENT INDICATION WAS OCCURRING AT (B)(6). VARIOUS ORTHOKITS OF THE NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SYSTEM (INSTRUMENTS AND IMPLANTS) WERE STATIONED ON SITE. INSTRUCTION OF THE INSTRUMENTS WAS CONDUCTED ON SITE. DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE NAVIGATED VIPER PRIME SETTINGS, IT WAS ALSO VERBALLY AGREED WITH THE USERS THAT ANY OPERATIONS WITH THIS NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SET OF INSTRUMENTS MAY ONLY BE CARRIED OUT BY A SURGICAL ASSISTANT OR BY A REPRESENTATIVE. UP TO (B)(6) 2021, ABOUT 2-3 ACCOMPANIED SURGERIES OF THIS TYPE WERE SUCCESSFULLY CARRIED OUT BY DR (B)(6) AND/OR PRIMARY BAUER. A SURGERY WAS PLANNED FOR (B)(6) 2021. NO OBJECTION TO CARRYING OUT SUCH SURGERIES EXCLUSIVELY WITH A SURGICAL ACCOMPANIMENT FROM A SYNTHES REPRESENTATIVE WAS JUSTIFIED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE USERS ARE SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THIS SYSTEM AND THAT ALL IMPLANTS ARE COMPLETE. DR. (B)(6) ON (B)(6), 2022 REPORTED OVER THE PHONE ABOUT A PATIENT SPECIFIC CASE WITH THE PER

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14384099 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2022Migration; Migration

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TEST PHASE WITH THE PERCUTANEOUS STABILIZATION SYSTEM "VIPER PRIME" IN COMBINATION WITH THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM FROM BRAINLAB IN THE CONTEXT OF A PATIENT-SPECIFIC PATIENT INDICATION WAS OCCURRING AT THE (B)(6). VARIOUS ORTHOKITS OF THE NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SYSTEM (INSTRUMENTS AND IMPLANTS) WERE STATIONED ON SITE. INSTRUCTION OF THE INSTRUMENTS WAS CONDUCTED ON SITE. DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE NAVIGATED VIPER PRIME SETTINGS, IT WAS ALSO VERBALLY AGREED WITH THE USERS THAT ANY OPERATIONS WITH THIS NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SET OF INSTRUMENTS MAY ONLY BE CARRIED OUT BY A SURGICAL ASSISTANT OR BY A REPRESENTATIVE. UP TO (B)(6) 2021, ABOUT 2-3 ACCOMPANIED SURGERIES OF THIS TYPE WERE SUCCESSFULLY CARRIED OUT BY DR. (B)(6) AND/OR PRIMARY (B)(6). A SURGERY WAS PLANNED FOR (B)(6) 2021. NO OBJECTION TO CARRYING OUT SUCH SURGERIES EXCLUSIVELY WITH A SURGICAL ACCOMPANIMENT FROM A SYNTHES REPRESENTATIVE WAS JUSTIFIED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE USERS ARE SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THIS SYSTEM AND THAT ALL IMPLANTS ARE COMPLETE. DR. (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2022 REPORTED OVER THE PHONE ABOUT A PATIENT SPECIFIC CASE WITH THE

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14380792 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2022Migration; Migration

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TEST PHASE WITH THE PERCUTANEOUS STABILIZATION SYSTEM "VIPER PRIME" IN COMBINATION WITH THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM FROM BRAINLAB IN THE CONTEXT OF A PATIENT-SPECIFIC PATIENT INDICATION WAS OCCURRING AT THE (B)(6) DEPARTMENT OF NEUROSURGERY. VARIOUS ORTHOKITS OF THE NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SYSTEM (INSTRUMENTS AND IMPLANTS) WERE STATIONED ON SITE. INSTRUCTION OF THE INSTRUMENTS WAS CONDUCTED ON SITE. DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE NAVIGATED VIPER PRIME SETTINGS, IT WAS ALSO VERBALLY AGREED WITH THE USERS THAT ANY OPERATIONS WITH THIS NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SET OF INSTRUMENTS MAY ONLY BE CARRIED OUT BY A SURGICAL ASSISTANT OR BY A REPRESENTATIVE. UP TO (B)(6) 2021, ABOUT 2-3 ACCOMPANIED SURGERIES OF THIS TYPE WERE SUCCESSFULLY CARRIED OUT BY DR (B)(6) AND/OR PRIMARY BAUER. A SURGERY WAS PLANNED FOR (B)(6) 2021. NO OBJECTION TO CARRYING OUT SUCH SURGERIES EXCLUSIVELY WITH A SURGICAL ACCOMPANIMENT FROM A SYNTHES REPRESENTATIVE WAS JUSTIFIED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE USERS ARE SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THIS SYSTEM AND THAT ALL IMPLANTS ARE COMPLETE. DR. (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2022 REPORTED OVER THE PHONE ABOUT A PATIE

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14380574 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2022Migration; Migration

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TEST PHASE WITH THE PERCUTANEOUS STABILIZATION SYSTEM "VIPER PRIME" IN COMBINATION WITH THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM FROM BRAINLAB IN THE CONTEXT OF A PATIENT-SPECIFIC PATIENT INDICATION WAS OCCURRING AT THE (B)(6). VARIOUS ORTHOKITS OF THE NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SYSTEM (INSTRUMENTS AND IMPLANTS) WERE STATIONED ON SITE. INSTRUCTION OF THE INSTRUMENTS WAS CONDUCTED ON SITE. DUE TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE NAVIGATED VIPER PRIME SETTINGS, IT WAS ALSO VERBALLY AGREED WITH THE USERS THAT ANY OPERATIONS WITH THIS NAVIGABLE VIPER PRIME SET OF INSTRUMENTS MAY ONLY BE CARRIED OUT BY A SURGICAL ASSISTANT OR BY A REPRESENTATIVE. UP TO (B)(6) 2021, ABOUT 2-3 ACCOMPANIED SURGERIES OF THIS TYPE WERE SUCCESSFULLY CARRIED OUT BY DR (B)(6) AND/OR PRIMARY BAUER. A SURGERY WAS PLANNED FOR (B)(6) 2021. NO OBJECTION TO CARRYING OUT SUCH SURGERIES EXCLUSIVELY WITH A SURGICAL ACCOMPANIMENT FROM A SYNTHES REPRESENTATIVE WAS JUSTIFIED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE USERS ARE SUFFICIENTLY FAMILIAR WITH THIS SYSTEM AND THAT ALL IMPLANTS ARE COMPLETE. DR. (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2022 REPORTED OVER THE PHONE ABOUT A PATIENT SPECIFIC CASE WITH THE P

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14380187 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.