EXPEDIUM VERSE 299704272Recalls & reported problems
Medos International Sàrl · EXPEDIUM VERSE SPINE SYSTEM FLEX CLIP REDUCER, THREADED INSERT · Class 1
All models of EXPEDIUM VERSE (90)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034477206), received between Oct 22, 2017 and Dec 13, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Device-Device Incompatibility2
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Injury1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 13, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN AUSTRALIA AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SPINAL FUSION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022, THE SURGEON WAS ATTEMPTING TO ATTACH THE FLEX CLIP REDUCER HANDLE TO THE FLEX CLIP REDUCER THREADED INSERT. THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO ATTACH IT AS THE FLEX CLIP REDUCER THREADED INSERT WAS TOO THICK. THE FLEX CLIP REDUCER INSERT WAS EXCHANGED FOR ONE IN THE VERSE STD SET AND IT WORKED. THE PATIENT APPEARED TO BE UNAFFECTED. AN EXTRA 10 MINUTES OF SURGERY TIME WAS ADDED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE EXPEDIUM VERSE SPINE SYSTEM FLEX CLIP REDUCER, THREADED INSERT. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15969839 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2022Break; Device-Device Incompatibility; Break; Device-Device Incompatibility
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PLASTIC RING OF THE EV CLIP ON THE REDUCER REDUCT TIP WAS BROKEN AND RELEASED THE PIECE INSIDE THE CLIP ON. IT THEN DIDN¿T ALLOW THE REMOVAL OF THE CLIP ON FROM THE TOP NOTCH OF THE SCREW HEAD. SURGERY WAS DELAYED BY 15 MINUTES AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, AND THERE WAS NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE EXPEDIUM VERSE SPINE SYSTEM FLEX CLIP REDUCER, THREADED INSERT. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15822393 ↗MalfunctionJun 22, 2022Break; Break
DEVICE REPORT FROM CANADA REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN 2022, THE INSTRUMENTS BROKE. THIS REPORT IS FOR AN EXPEDIUM VERSE SPINE SYSTEM FLEX CLIP REDUCER, THREADED INSERT. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14773990 ↗InjuryOct 22, 2017Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
L5-S1 POSTERIOR LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION. DEVICE IS USED AS A TWO PART DEVICE. THREADED INSERTER 2997 04 272 JAMMED IN 2997 04 270 WHILE SURGEON WAS USING. TABS ON PEDICLE SCREW WERE BROKEN, AND REDUCTION INSTRUMENTS WERE NEEDED TO PERFORM REDUCTION TECHNIQUE. FLEX CLIP WAS ATTACHED ONTO TOP NOTCH OF PEDICLE SCREW . THREADER INSERTER THEN INSERTED INTO FLEX CLIP TO PERFORM REDUCTION, WHILE WINDING DOWN ON BLACK REDUCER HANDLE, A CRACK WAS HEARD. NO MORE INSERTION WAS POSSIBLE. REDUCTION WAS NOT PERFORMED, SURGEON WOUND OUT 2997 04 272. FLEX CLIP 2997 04 270 WAS UNCLIPPED FROM PEDICLE SCREW USING A BONE RONGEUER. PIECE OF 2997 04 272 STILL STUCK IN 2997 04 270. THIRTY MINUTE DELAY TO PROCEDURE. NO AE TO PATIENT. 'PRODUCT DISCARDED' HAS BEEN SELECTED FOR PRODUCT STATUS IN THIS INSTANCE AS THERE IS NO APPROPRIATE STATUS AVAILABLE TO REPRESENT THE FOLLOWING LOCAL PROCESS: INSTRUMENT WILL BE SENT TO LOCAL ENGINEERING FOR ASSESSMENT OF WEAR AND TEAR. IF 'WEAR AND TEAR' IS ASSIGNED, A COPY OF THE LOCAL ASSESSMENT WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR THEIR RECORD AND CASE CLOSURE. IN THE CASE WEAR AND TEAR CANNOT BE ASSIGNED BY THE ENGINEER, THE PRODUCT WILL BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACT
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 6967840 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page